Tag compound growth

Compound Growth or High Yield?

Paul - The Wry Eye Guy Leave a comment
Wish I’d stayed awake for that class!

Compounding confounds & confuses the best of us sometimes. It feels like having a bigger yield to DRIP should work better than waiting for the share price to grow, right? After all, turning on the DRIP on a higher yielding ETF means we’re buying far more shares with every dividend or distribution payout. And that’s true, we are buying more shares with a bigger yield. But that does not mean that it outpaces the compound growth that happens within the share price of a lower yielding fund. Compounding is compounding, regardless of where it occurs. And in a growth stock, or in an ETF filled with growth stocks, the compounding is done by stealth, inside the share price. Not via a distribution. And that does not take away its compounding power. It may even add to it.

I’m a big fan of their funds, so let’s look at three from the BMO stable for this exercise. ZSP is their S&P 500® Index tracker, ZDY is BMO’s US Dividend ETF, & ZWH is the BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF. Here’s what the total returns look like for each, with DRIP on …

I like all three of these funds. ZSP has the lowest yield, typically ranging from about 1.5 to 2%. ZDY has generally floated between 2.5 & 3.5% over the years, while ZWH targets about 6%, give or take a little. The old adage holds true, it’s tough to beat the index fund. ZSP turned $100k into almost $313k over this timeline. ZDY managed to deliver an end value of almost $230k, while ZWH finished at just over $226k. That’s a very respectable comparative return for a covered call ETF.

Despite the positive performance of all these ETFs, the lowest yielding ETF provided the greatest total return. Okay so we know this already, eh? But the confusion tends to increase when we get around to talking about selling shares for income. That strikes fear into the heart of every retiree, even those who can do the math. After all, we’re selling off some of our little geese that lay those golden eggs for us, eh!
Here’s what that looks like for these three ETFs …

To level the playing field, I used a $6k withdrawal in Year 1 for all three funds, & adjusted for inflation annually in the following years. What remains is each fund’s value after an identical withdrawal. That withdrawal rate approximately matches the higher average distribution rate available from ZWH. ZWH is the only fund of the three that could have avoided selling shares to supply that level of income over this time. However, despite having to sell more shares, the end value of ZSP is $210k. That is significantly more than the $146k remaining in ZDY, & the $143k in ZWH. Despite having to sell more shares to meet the income requirement, the lower yielding funds did better over these years.

Compound growth is just as magical as compound interest or DRIP-driven compound growth. Perhaps it’s even more magical because it doesn’t feel right that you could continue to do better with an ever-declining share count. For better or worse, numbers don’t really care about our feelings!

While the index fund won out over this timeline, there is the potential to have market conditions where a covered call fund might do better. You’ll notice that the ZSP line dips below that of ZWH in 2015 & 2016. Had those market conditions prevailed, ZWH might have continued to lead. They didn’t & ZSP took the lead again. And it stayed ahead through to 2024. While the past doesn’t predict the future, the general tendency for growth in the market suggests that a more growth oriented index fund is likely to outperform over the long haul. Even the bigger downdraft of the index ETF in 2022 wasn’t enough to drag it back down to the level of the other two. During the accumulation phase, it’s all about building the biggest portfolio before retirement. In the decumulation phase, it’s all about portfolio survival!

SOME WORDS OF CAUTION!
This comparison is done over a very short, but generally successful, period of performance for the American markets. I started with a $6k withdrawal rate for this example, to approximate the 6% yield of the highest yielding ETF. But I do not think this is an appropriate withdrawal rate to use for retirement planning. There are reasons why professionals use the 4% Rule in Monte Carlo simulations. It allows for a better hypothetical portfolio survival rate under a greater variety of market conditions. In addition, they may even introduce some additional curtailment or flexibility guidelines to a retirement plan, so that a portfolio survives better during down periods. The caution here is that converting everything to high yield funds in retirement might not provide the best outcome if there are tough times ahead. No question, there are times when it may have worked well. But there is greater exposure to catastrophe if things don’t work so well going forward.
For example, things would have looked very different for a retiree trying to do this starting in the year 2000. Even with an index fund. I used SPY to look at this &, starting with a $6k withdrawal. The portfolio would have gone to zero by 2012. If the withdrawal started at $4k, or 4% of the original portfolio, it will still be delivering income today.
Would a covered call ETF have fared better then? I don’t know, many of today’s funds weren’t around back then. They are too new to assess how they might navigate turbulent markets like those of the lost decade. But having a big yield doesn’t always protect the value of the underlying assets. Choose your retirement strategy with great caution.

If you want to learn more about all this from the ground up, I’d like to suggest that you check out Double Double Your Money, available at your local Amazon store.

Important – this is not investing, tax or legal advice, it is for entertainment & educational purposes only. Data may not be accurate, check the current & historical data carefully at each fund’s website. Opinions are my own, so do your own due diligence & seek professional advice before investing your money.

Lies, Damned Lies, & Compound Growth

Paul - The Wry Eye Guy 1 Comment
The Power of Compound Growth

Compound growth (or losses!) can be confusing. When it comes to compounding, using quick mental arithmetic to make investing decisions can be detrimental to our financial health. If we don’t take the time to understand the power of compound growth, to feel its power, we might not even find the motivation to start saving & investing. That might prove to be a costly oversight down the road. And it’s very difficult to compensate for those lost years later. Life really is too short.

Try this little brain teaser …

If someone offered you a penny to work all day, would you do it?
No, eh!
What if they asked you to work for a full month but, this time, they offered you a penny for the first day of the month & then promised to double the previous day’s pay for you, every day, ’til the end of the month?
If you think this is a trick question, you’re right. But without grabbing a calculator, how much to you think you’d be owed at the end of the month? Take a stab at picking a number now & I’ll share the calculations further down.

Ever since Jack Bogle gave us the low-cost index fund, there has been widespread support for retail investors, particularly younger investors with a long time horizon, to follow that path. Even the inimitable Mr. Buffett recommends low-cost, index-tracking funds for most of us. After taking fees into account, there aren’t too many actively managed funds that can beat the market index over time. The market has grown by about 10% annually for a century or more. If it works like that going forward, a kid saving $100 a week from age 20 to 65 might have a portfolio worth almost four million dollars by retirement. That’s the power of compounding. If the kid invests in an equivalent high-fee fund that reduces that annual growth rate to 8%, the portfolio would be worth a little over two million come retirement day. That’s the power of compounding in reverse! Fees of “only” 2% eliminated almost 50% of the end value. Fees compound too. Just not in favour of the investor.

The magic of compound growth is tough to visualize with any degree of accuracy. I need a tool or a calculator to compare investing returns over time. Particularly when it comes to comparing a growth investment against one that pays a dividend that gets reinvested. While past performance may not be replicated going forward, historical performance can make for some interesting comparisons. And those real comparisons will probably be very different to guesstimates based on my mental arithmetic. Our heads don’t do compounding well. But compounding might do well for us. If we allow it enough time to work it’s magic. Play with a compound growth calculator. It might encourage you to get started. Once you understand the power of compounding, you should be motivated to get started right away. Compounding takes time & patience. But you’ll never truly get to appreciate its value if you don’t start early enough.

What if you’re old already? I know that story all too well. Each investor has a different risk tolerance, level of knowledge, savings rate, & so on. Even two investors with very similar investor profiles may invest in very different portfolios. Compounding doesn’t care. It will do whatever it can with our investments, with whatever time is available. Based on your investing style, plug in the numbers for your timeline, with your expected rate of return. See if the possible outcomes are close to where you’d like to be by retirement day. If not, you might need to save more, sooner, to get there. Or maybe you’ll see that financial freedom is not too far away for you. A compound growth app might be one of the best games to have on a mobile device!

Does your head do compounding well? What number did you come up with from the opening question?
At the end of the first week, you’d be due about a buck & a quarter. Not even enough for a cup of coffee these days. Pretty awful, eh! By the end of the 2nd week, that would jump to $164. Hardly earth shattering. The 3rd week, however, would be almost $21k. Yes, twenty one thousand dollars. Things are improving now. At the end of the 4th week, the number would be almost $2.7 million. And only three days later, at the end of the 31st day, it would be almost $21.5 million.
The total wages due on that penny starter wage, by the end of the 31st day of the month, would be almost twenty one & a half million dollars. Now, that’s some kind of compounding!
How close was your guess!?!

I like the calculator at the Ontario Securities Commission website here. The graph of results here shows a great image of how the power of compounding works better over time. Go play!

Important – this is not investing advice, it is for entertainment & educational purposes only. Do your own due diligence & seek professional advice before investing your money.