Tag Investing Early

Saving & Investing for Kids

Financial Planning is Guesswork

Paul - The Wry Eye Guy Leave a comment
When a Plan Comes Together!

Financial planning is based on estimates & projections. It’s educated & data-driven guesswork. The return projection numbers are so precise that they run to two decimal places. Reality is not that predictable! Planning projections for equities have been about 6.5%, give or take, for the past few years. On a year by year basis, it’s been way off. Markets have done far better. They could have done far worse. But the projections generally work well, when considering average returns, over longer timelines. After the exceptional market returns of the 90s, a financial plan using 6.5% for projections might have been considered too conservative. But a 50/50 mix of the US & Canada would have returned an average of almost 8% annually, from 2000 up to today. Looking back, that 6.5% wouldn’t have been a bad number to create a plan with in 1999, eh? But things can get crazy over shorter time horizons. Especially when retirement withdrawals come into play.

Grumpy old guys & gals who retired in the last 10 or 15 years complain about not being able to draw down their big RRIF accounts fast enough. Their portfolios are growing faster than they can spend them down. While many of these retirees are probably brilliant investors, some just got lucky! They timed the start date of their retirement pretty much perfectly. The 50:50 US & Canada portfolio would have returned almost 12% annually since 2010. Almost double that 6.5% planning number. Now there’s nothing wrong with being lucky. But luck is not always good enough for retirement planning.

That same 50:50 portfolio would only have returned a little more than 2% annually from 2000 to 2009. An investor who went all in on the American market over that decade would have had a negative return. The US market lost money over that 10 year period. And that’s without withdrawing any retirement income from it. The really big question with financial planning going forward, especially for new or imminent retirees, is this … what will the next few years be like? Those early retirement years can matter. A lot. As we saw above, average return numbers work really well over the long haul. But a severe or protracted downturn in early retirement, like the 2000 to 2009 period, can make a real mess of a plan. Taking a big hit immediately after retirement can seriously impair income for all the years that follow. The message here is that we cannot assume that the high returns of recent years will continue. Planning must allow for these different outcomes.

Financial planning guidelines have to thread a needle with respect for a wide range of potential returns. And it’s wise to err a little on the conservative side of what the long term data say. Many recent retirees, & new financial advisors, have not experienced something like the lost decade back in the early 2000s. To varying extents, we are all influenced by recency bias. And recently, things have been great. But we may need to temper the optimism & plan a little more cautiously for the future. Especially if retirement is imminent. Despite our retired friend’s success over the past 5 or 10 years, thinking we can begin retirement & spend at a consistent 10% rate is very risky.

So if planning is just guesswork, should we ignore it? Absolutely not! Nobody can foretell what happens next, but that makes having a plan even more critical. The purpose is to figure out how to best use our money so that we can pay the rent & buy groceries all the way to the end. Plans include success rate estimates & simulations that show if the plan can survive the best & the worst combinations of market cycles.  Plans can include fun things like bucket list travel & fancy cars. Along with some things we hope aren’t needed, like illness or meeting long term care needs. It’s important to have a plan that considers the many vagaries of retirement. It’s equally important to have regular plan reviews & revisions over the years to ensure things stay on track.

Getting a financial plan done professionally can be very expensive. If you are paying an advisor to manage your retirement, financial planning may, indeed probably should, be included as part of that service. A good financial plan is a crucial part of living a successful retirement. Even for those DIY folk with a good knowledge of what’s required, having another set of eyes review the plan may still make sense. Indeed, it may be worth having a plan done by more than just one professional advisor. I know, sorry!

DIY folk tend to be frugal by nature & some may not want to pay for a professional plan. I get that. But you could ask about getting a review of your DIY plan, or a freebie, or a demo plan from whatever institution you have your money at. Some financial institutions provide that service. Sometimes you just need to ask. Fortunately, more & more planning tools are becoming available for the DIY cohort nowadays. Maybe with AI, we’ll even get some apps for that! But until that perfect app arrives, & perhaps even afterwards, getting a professional financial plan done might matter for most of us. Planning, especially for retirement spending, is quite complex. If you are not using a professional to put a plan together, there are some tools available that may help. Check out some of the tools in this post DIY Financial Planning … An Update. I have used the Adviice platform mentioned there & there are others like Optiml & MayRetire that I haven’t played with yet. Doing our own planning on a spreadsheet usually carries a greater risk of error. Whereas these platforms are getting feedback from a wider public audience, which helps weed out the errors & improve the product over time. Some of them have an access path to professional planning services. It’s great to see tools coming onto the market for DIY financial planning. As they improve & get smarter, perhaps they’ll help the profession space to offer more competitive services too. But until that happens, we’re stuck paying more. And despite the high price, it’s worth the spend if it helps us avoid a bad outcome.

If you want to learn more about saving & investing, please check out Double Double Your Money, available at your local Amazon store.

Important – this is not investing, tax or legal advice, it is for entertainment & conversation-provoking purposes only. Data may not be accurate. Check the current & historical data carefully at any company’s or provider’s website, particularly where a specific product, stock or fund is mentioned. Opinions are my own & I regularly get things wrong, so do your own due diligence & seek professional advice before investing your money.

DIY Investing or Work With a Financial Advisor?

Paul - The Wry Eye Guy Leave a comment
Good old-fashioned financial advice.
But at what price?

DIY investing can drive you a little crazy. Do you like the crazy? Are you enjoying the work that comes with portfolio management? Some of us do! But it gets a little more challenging when we need to withdraw money during retirement. And will a surviving spouse be able to carry on with the crazy portfolio in the event the “money manager” departs first? Are you a good DIY investor? Or would you do better with an advisor?

There is an easy way to figure out if you should consider paying a fee to have a professional manage your portfolio & the retirement cashflow stream for you.
And it’s this …

Compare your DIY portfolio performance against an equivalent ETF. We all need a “benchmark” to check our portfolio against. If you’re 100% in globally diversified stocks, for example, compare your portfolio performance to that of one of the XEQT, ZEQT, VEQT all-equity ETFs. If you’re in a 60/40 stock & fixed income mix, compare your DIY portfolio performance against XBAL, ZBAL, or VBAL. Are you buying a mix of Canadian & US large-cap stocks? Then compare that to an appropriately allocated portfolio of VFV & XIU ETFs. A portfolio filled with way too many stocks & ETFs might also be usefully compared against one of the all-in-ones. If your portfolio performance lags its benchmark by 1% or more, you might want to consider handing it over to a financial manager.

As an aside, since some of these all-in-one funds are so new, you may need to break them down into their constituent ETFs to usefully use them for benchmarking over longer time periods. The longer the history, the more useful the insights.

I’m using 1% here because many financial advisors charge an annual 1% of portfolio value as a fee for managing a portfolio. Is that fee worth it? Get the advisor’s performance history & compare that to an equivalent benchmark ETF too. Their recommended portfolio should only lag the return performance of those ETFs by the 1% fee. If they meet that requirement and if your self-managed portfolio was lagging by more than 1%, you could be getting better results by paying the advisor the 1% fee. As a bonus, you’ll have less work & an advisor who will tell you that everything will be okay when the markets are imploding. Hand-holding is included in their fee! For retirees, the advisor may also plan the income strategy & tax-efficiently manage the cashflow for you, across all accounts. You might even get some estate planning advice along the way. If you have a good advisor, they can deliver a lot of value. Even if they underperform the market average by the amount of the fee they charge.

Can you find an advisor that will consistently beat, after fees, the market or benchmark returns? I don’t know, but be sure to review their data supporting this opinion very carefully. And not necessarily against the benchmark provided by the advisor.

Unfortunately, it can be pretty challenging to tell if an advisor is any good. And those investors who are most challenged by DIY investing will also be challenged by the process of choosing a good advisor. We all like to believe we have the best doctor taking care of our health. In reality, most of them will be closer to average than exceptional. Fortunately, there are minimum standards & qualifications that we hope will ensure an adequate level of service from these professionals. The same is only variably true for financial advisors. Because the qualifications for calling yourself a financial advisor in Canada are variable. Some advisors are closer to being a product salesperson. And while some feel or profess a fiduciary responsibility, it is not a legal duty or obligation for many. They cannot just take your money & head off to a beach somewhere, but they may be putting their own, or their company’s, interests just slightly ahead of yours when it comes to investment choices. Even if only subconsciously.

Of course, a good salesperson will make you feel better about the relationship you are getting into. And that’s not a bad thing. But you also need an advisor who can at least deliver average market returns for a broadly diversified portfolio. Minus the fees. And you do need to know exactly how much you’re paying for whatever services & products are being recommended! There may be advisory fees and product fees, check carefully.

If you are a balanced 60/40 style investor, what would you think of paying an advisor to put all your money into ZBAL? Or maybe 60% into XEQT, with the other 40% into a couple of bond & HISA-type ETFs? We sometimes resent paying for simplicity. Advisors know this & are less likely to present you with such a simple portfolio solution. After all, if things are that simple, why would we need an advisor!
Yet, in DIY mode, we sometimes struggle to follow the simple path ourselves. Instead, we prefer to work hard creating a portfolio that underperforms!

Of course, that simple solution might not be the ideal path for everyone. There may well be good reasons for some investors to pursue a lower volatility strategy, a higher income strategy, or whatever. But it is still useful to compare the total return on our own portfolios against those of low-cost, market index ETFs.

Robo-advisors are trying to bridge the gap between the advisory space & DIY, typically for about a 0.5% fee premium, in addition to ETF fees. I love the idea but it feels like you’re paying the added fee for the robo to pick the same ETFs that are in the all-in-one ETFs. Like some human services, they can fancy it up with one or two more esoteric picks. So you feel like you’re getting something extra for your money. But you generally won’t get the more valuable hand-holding that comes with the more expensive advisory services. Maybe AI will help with this down the road. But AI has been around for a lot longer than current market noise suggests & it hasn’t happened yet. Some robo-services do include human phone support. That might develop & grow into something more valuable going forward.

Isn’t there scope for fee reduction on the human advisory side too? Or for a service with a far more rapidly declining tiered fee-structure for larger portfolios? Are there any low-cost advisors out there? Shouldn’t there be more advisors competing with the 0.5% fees of the robo-advisors. Simpler portfolio advice & management should come with lower fees, no? I’m okay with portfolios constructed with low cost index funds. For some investors, the greater value may be more in managing asset location (what ETF goes in which account) & retirement cashflow. Some advisors include financial planning, a valuable service too. But can it be done for a 0.5% fee? Or less?

I realise that someone else’s job always looks easier than it really is from the outside. But I think financial advisory (& real estate) fees are very expensive in Canada. Particularly for the cookie-cutter portfolios offered by some companies. I’m totally okay with the right cookie-cutter portfolio, I just don’t want to pay through the nose for it. High fees are an ignorance premium being levied on a population that didn’t get this kind of knowledge coming through our educational system. And our schools still don’t prepare kids for the digital environment that now makes it far easier for the DIY investor to learn things the hard way. Fees will likely drop over time, as education & AI combine to work at improving the competitive landscape. Though in traditional Canadian fashion, it’ll probably drag out for a long time yet. And some of us older folk might not live long enough to benefit! 🤪

Regardless of the path we choose, it’s worth occasionally benchmarking our portfolio performance against a low-cost, well-diversified, ETF portfolio. One that approximately matches our portfolio’s asset allocation. Benchmarking can provide insight on how decent a job we’re doing with our investing strategy. And if we’re not doing such a good job ourselves, it may be worth talking to a financial advisor. But if you still find the idea of paying an advisor distasteful, then you’d better figure out how to learn to do it better on your own. Or maybe just use the benchmark ETFs instead!

If you want to learn more about saving & investing from the ground up, I’d like to suggest that you check out Double Double Your Money, available at your local Amazon store.

Important – this is not investing, tax or legal advice, it is for entertainment & conversation-provoking purposes only. Data may not be accurate. Check the current & historical data carefully at any company’s or provider’s website, particularly where a specific product, stock or fund is mentioned. Opinions are my own & I regularly get things wrong, so do your own due diligence & seek professional advice before investing your money.

Getting Started with Investing

Paul - The Wry Eye Guy Leave a comment
The Right Basket of Market Index Funds!

We needed to choose some wall & floor tiles when we bought our last new house. The builder worked with a local tile shop & we were sent there to make our selections. We spent several hours driving ourselves nuts. We were totally frustrated & depressed when we left. After three hours, the staff were relieved to see us go. And we still hadn’t chosen anything! Worse, we’d left the store in a mess. Tiles were spread across half the showroom floor. There were so many to choose from, we just couldn’t make up our minds. I called the store next morning & asked them to lay out about a dozen choices that were mainly black & charcoal. We went back & made our selections from the samples laid out. And we were on our way within ten minutes. Job done. Once we’d decided on a general colour theme, limiting the choices made it far easier to choose.

Investing can be a bit like that for new investors. There are too many choices. Should you invest in stocks or ETFs? For just about all beginning investors, the better choice is ETFs. But, on the Canadian exchange, I think there are more ETFs than stocks now. So which ETFs should you invest in? There are actively managed funds & those that passively track market indices or broad markets. Since, after fees, most professionals can’t beat broad market & index funds, most of the time, the correct answer for most of us is broad market or index funds. Now you are down to the black & charcoal tile scenario! All you’ve got left to do now is figure out which market funds to go with. Fortunately, the fund providers have made this easy for us these days. Not only have they reduced the selection of tiles we need to look at, they’ve put them all in one shopping cart for us.

Many fund providers in Canada offer a globally diversified basket of market index funds that cover the US, Canadian, developed, & emerging markets. The big three providers in Canada, Blackrock, BMO, & Vanguard, offer XEQT, ZEQT, & VEQT, respectively, for this very purpose. You still have to choose one. But the good news is that it doesn’t matter which one you choose, they’re virtually identical. If you want to feel better about it, choose one for your TFSA & a different one in your RRSP. Draw your choices out of a hat, if you like. You are now invested in broad market index funds across the globe. Make your initial investment in these funds & continue to add to them with every paycheque. Job done!

The online noise might suggest you do something differently. For example, the S&P 500® funds, like Vanguard’s VFV, have done phenomenally well for the past decade or more. The American market has crushed the competition. Investors are drawn towards whatever is doing well. That drives the price up. To be fair, there are worse things you could do than get into the US market. AI has a lot of allure these days, for example. However, it is worth remembering the lessons of history. If you’d invested in an S&P 500® fund back in 2000, you’d find yourself with about the same amount in your portfolio after ten years. Yes, today’s hot index created no wealth for a full decade back then. While the Canadian index about doubled over that same period. The Japanese market tumbled from its all time high in 1989. It took 34 years to get back to that high. Even “good” broad market indices can sometimes hurt if you take a narrow focus. Especially over shorter timelines. These global equity funds have all the markets. Including an overweight to the American market. You’re not missing out on what the American market offers, you are just diversifying more. The American market may continue to outperform. But that is still a narrow bet, with an uncertain outcome. Warren Buffett has the confidence & skill to go in harder on more winners than losers. And he loves the American market. But he tends to think in far longer investing timelines than the rest of us. These equity funds are globally diversifed. Diversification is considered the only free lunch in the investing world. And this global approach is a good investing appetiser for a novice investor.

Look, you might not shoot the lights out with one of the above funds. Or at least, not quickly. But you might have a decent chance of growing your wealth over time. Start out this way until you learn more. And when you learn more, you might even decide this is still the best approach for you. Trying to pick the winners, either stocks or narrowly focused ETFs, or trying to pick next year’s winning market, depends more on luck. And good luck with that!

If you invest in one of these funds, & if you continue to add to your investment with a little piece of every paycheque, you’re still not out of the woods. Because your investment will tumble anyway. It’ll go down 5% regularly, but it can also crash 10 or 20%, from time to time. Maybe even 50% or more on rare occasions. What will you do when that happens? What you should do is keep on investing your regular contributions. Buying more of the good stuff when it’s on sale will help grow your long-term wealth even more. Those periodic tumbles are a natural part of the process. Investing is a long game. If you are 30 today, you have 35 years to go to retirement at 65. You might have another 30 years of retirement to get through. That’s a 65 year investing timeline. Historically, the longer the investing timeline, the lower the risk of loss. But the risk of volatility is always with us on the journey. And it’s tough to weather short-term volatility. That’ll be one of the most challenging lessons to learn along the way. While past performance has no bearing on what the future might hold, it’s all we’ve got to go on. Markets have always recovered & gone on to new highs. And if we ever reach a point where global markets fail to grow over time, we’ll have a whole other set of problems that our investments likely won’t fix. Instead of an emergency fund, we’ll need a farm in the wilderness!

Investing is tough, but these globally diversified funds make it easier to get started. And for young investors, getting started early is important. The best education comes from having something invested. And with these funds, you won’t be paralysed trying to choose something from everything available. Because you’ll have a little bit of everything in your shopping cart.

The tiles turned out great, btw!

If you want to learn more about saving & investing from the ground up, I’d like to suggest that you check out Double Double Your Money, available at your local Amazon store.

Important – this is not investing, tax or legal advice, it is for entertainment & conversation-provoking purposes only. Data may not be accurate. Check the current & historical data carefully at any company’s or provider’s website, particularly where a specific product, stock or fund is mentioned. Opinions are my own & I regularly get things wrong, so do your own due diligence & seek professional advice before investing your money

Women Suck at Investing

Paul - The Wry Eye Guy Leave a comment

The title is clickbait, please bear with me & I will try to redeem myself. If you do an internet search with that same title in the search box, what you’ll find is a series of links to pieces & papers that suggest exactly the opposite is true. Women, it turns out, are generally better investors than men. Guys seem to run on testosterone-addled brains that make them do silly things when it comes to investing. So women who are investing generally outperform men. However, this is not about which gender makes for a better investor. It’s about those women who are not saving & investing for their long-term financial security.

The challenge for women as group is that fewer women are investing, as a proportion of their gender population. Those women who are not saving & investing may have exposure to greater retirement challenges. Women are more likely to face poverty in retirement than men. There is a gender pension gap that results in a great number of women surviving on lower income in retirement.

Despite all the progress with gender equality over time, it’s just not enough. There are still glass ceilings that women butt up against in the workplace. Many companies pay women less than men for doing the same job. Some women are channeled into lower paid & temporary or part-time jobs. And women tend to be the ones that take career breaks to raise children. All these things lead to a lower lifetime income. And lower lifetime income can lead to a lower retirement income from savings & pension plans, including the Canada Pension Plan, for women. With women living longer than men, this only adds to their challenges for retirement. Women, on average, will need a bigger retirement nest-egg than a man, to take them through that longer retirement phase. And many women are not saving & investing enough, early enough, to counter that predicament.

While women continue to work on fixing all those other issues of inequality, saving & investing should be a priority from the earliest working years. Don’t trust your neanderthal male partner to do it for you. We’re not that good at it! This is one area where women can seize the advantage. By starting early. Given enough time, an early start can level the playing field.

Why do I care? Because my wife is likely to outlive me by, not just years, but decades. For some of us, the challenges only come to light much later in life. And I have kids, including a daughter. I’d like them to get started early too. I wish I’d known more in my younger years.

Unfortunately, the kind of people who are reading this stuff are probably already engaged & knowledgeable. You are likely already saving & investing towards a more secure financial future. But if you have friends who are not, please encourage them to start. Investing looks like a digital casino to those unfamiliar with it. But it doesn’t have to be. And, as I’m sure you know, it’s not so intimidating once you take the time to learn a little. Please share your knowledge with those who might benefit from it. And if you have kids, regardless of gender, help them get started on the path early. Unfortunately, the urgency to get started early only becomes obvious much later in life!

If you want to help a friend get started, encourage them to read Double Double Your Money.

Important – this is not investing, tax or legal advice, it is for entertainment & educational purposes only. Opinions are my own, so do your own due diligence & seek professional advice before investing your money.

Market Crash Lessons

Paul - The Wry Eye Guy Leave a comment
What Next?

I’m trying to encourage my kids to save & invest while they are young. As usual, Dad’s advice turns to muck pretty much right off the bat. The markets tanked. I tell them, with great confidence & authority, that it’s just noise. To keep on saving & investing. That they’re just buying the good stuff on sale now. Listen to Dad.

There are lots of experts out there with advice on how to handle market losses. I must admit, I’m not one of them. I failed my biggest test back during the dot-com crash. I sold off all but one of my holdings then. The only one I held onto went to zero. All the stocks I sold would have made me money. Had I held onto them! What do you think I learned from that experience?

Stay out of the market, it’s just a lottery? Yeah, I did that for a while. Too long a while. But no, that’s not it … the lesson I seem to have learned is to be afraid of selling anything!

Nowadays, rather than chase what’s hot, I buy what’s not. Most of my investments are in bigger, bluer, dividend-growth companies. Or in ETFs that hold companies like that. But that doesn’t make a downward spiral any more enjoyable. Turns out big blue-chips can go down too. I have the same dilemma today: I don’t know if I should sell, hold, or buy more. Not knowing, I do what I do best … nothing! My stocks just sit there, showing red, & I do nothing. The automatic DRIP adds new shares on dividend pay days. I don’t need to do anything with that either.

I have neither the quant skills nor the psychic ability to figure out what happens next in the market. Instead, I’m trying to get more comfortable just doing nothing. It reminds me of the few times in my career where the future of my employment was at risk. When I lost my jobs back then, I had no other sources of income. But I survived. Between the individual stocks & ETFs I own today, I own little pieces of hundreds of companies. What are the chances they’ll all fire me at the same time & kill the dividends? Pretty slim, I think.
What are the chances that they’ll all go to zero? While there are no guarantees, that’s pretty unlikely too.

For a lazy & conflicted investor like me, it was almost a relief when I came round to thinking that doing nothing might be best. I still worry every time I see the market drop further. I wish I could just stop looking. I can’t. But, so far, I’m sticking with the do nothing strategy.

Only time will tell if if I can keep on doing that. And if that was the right thing to do. Especially for the sake of my kids! 😜