Tag technology

AI Personalities!

Paul - The Wry Eye Guy Leave a comment
Bot Buddy!

AI can be fun, eh? These days I use AI to touch up & modify my photographs in seconds. Ideas for a two week itinerary around Nova Scotia? AI can help. Need a recipe for dinner tonight? These bots can come up with answers to all kinds of questions. Of course, we don’t always like their answers. But some bots seem open to a little steering on some subjects. Pushing back on an AI response can steer them a little more towards our way of thinking. If we’re just looking for a digital buddy to agree with us, that’s great. If we’re looking for real guidance or real solutions, however, that’s maybe not so great. I wouldn’t bet the farm, or my retirement, on any AI advice just yet. Despite that, they’re still very useful. And a lot of fun to play with. I found a new way to play with my favorite AI buddies last week!

I was trying to solve an extreme Sudoku puzzle. After resetting the puzzle for the 3rd time, I thought I’d stuff it into some AI chatbots for assistance. I’d probably have got it done on the next attempt myself (😜), but this was a good opportunity to see what my digital pals would do. This was a just-for-fun comparison. It was less about solving the puzzle & more about insight into the personality traits of the chatbots that, I guessed, might struggle with this. In no particular order, here’s what the results feel like. Notice how I’m going with feelings here, instead of science!

I tossed in an image of the puzzle into Gemini &, within seconds, it confidently returned the solution. Along with a list of the key steps used to solve the puzzle. Only it wasn’t the solution. There were a couple of errors. After 10 attempts, the puzzle remained unsolved. But as the conversation rolled along, Gemini came across as somewhat sheepish, a little embarrassed even. And it sounded so apologetic, that I was sure it had some Canadian emotional training under the hood.
Despite not getting to a solution, the experience was a bit like having coffee with a buddy that got it wrong. But you couldn’t help but love & admire the effort. Very pleasant to interact with.

Meta AI came back promptly with a solution too. But before I could point out that it was incorrect, it actually spotted the error itself & went back into problem solving mode. Same thing after the second incorrect solution was offered. Another couple of passes without a good solution had it come back to me with questions. Was it blaming me now for giving it a poor input!?!
I called it out & asked it it was giving up. It took umbrage at that & went back to work! LOL
Still couldn’t do it & it then suggested that the colours in the image might be distorting things. Rather than trust itself to figure out the numbers from the image, it wanted me to type in the numbers. With this enthusiastic bot, it’s tough to get a word in edgewise sometimes. I was too lazy to input the numbers it wanted, so that meant the puzzle wasn’t solved, but it was a reasonably friendly interaction. And another buddy I’d enjoy having a coffee with!

Grok talked some sciencey & solutions logic, while offering to help me with the steps necessary to solve the puzzle myself. When I asked it to go ahead & solve it for me, it began outputting solution after solution in an attempt to deliver the correct one. After several minutes of that, & dozens of grids, I gave up & shut it off. I love Grok from other interactions, but it’s hard to read any personality into this sudoku engagement. I deleted the chat in case the poor thing felt obliged to continue working on the problem in the background! Though afterwards I felt guilty that I didn’t check a few of the solutions along the way, I just assumed it knew it was getting it wrong, verifying that, & then trying again.

Deepseek had a go & got it wrong on the first pass too. Immediately proclaiming “Wait, that can’t be right”, before getting back to work to give it another try. It didn’t take long for it to get around to questioning the image quality. And whether I had provided all the necessary info. It got back to work after I confirmed it had all the available information. Then, almost in anticipation of another failure, it mentioned having to ignore colour & shading on my image. It subsequently got into telling me about the complexity, the logic, the use of pencils, & so on. Almost like it was entertaining me. while working away furiously in the background! After another failure, it asked me to confirm other details & it wanted me to do a little more work again. I had a feel for its personality by then, so I didn’t take the time for that. It was a nice, polite, & engaging interaction. Though not the jocular, back-slapping type, it is a friendly little bot & enjoyable to use.

Claude is another polite & friendly bot that tripped up with this puzzle. It went into a couple of autocorrect steps before quickly recognising it wasn’t going to solve the puzzle & it admitted that! Suggesting instead that I input the challenge to one of the dedicated AI sudoku solvers. In the real world, that’d be the right thing to do. If you don’t know the answer, say you don’t know, right? I can respect a bot that takes that approach too. I’ve just recently started using this one & I’m enjoying the interactions. It has a slightly different feel & I look forward to seeing how that plays out with other engagements.

Copilot came back with a friendly comment, but it couldn’t read the numbers & immediately asked me to input them. I like & use Copilot in many other ways, but this wasn’t what I wanted from the sudoku exercise so I abandoned that conversation. In general, Copilot has a friendly personality & I enjoy using it for a whole range of other activities & questions. It just didn’t work out with the sudoku image this time.

ChatGPT was the last one I tried. Unfortunately, I didn’t learn much about the bot’s personality from this interaction. Why? Because it took one quick look & returned the correct solution. Job done!
However, I know from other interactions that this is generally a nice, polite & friendly bot too. Though I haven’t done this, you can even adjust its personality traits in your profile settings inside ChatGPT. While this has no bearing on how good the other bots are at any other activities, ChatGPT is the winner of this little sudoku challenge. Using the image I chose to input. And there’s not much science to my comparison, I was more interested in seeing how they reacted in the event they couldn’t solve the puzzle! Regardless of the brevity of this interaction, I generally enjoy using ChatGPT.

Just for fun, I went back to some of the other bots & told them that ChapGPT solved the puzzle at the first attempt! LOL

Gemini started its response to that with an “Ouch!” & some self-deprecating comments. But it was glad I got the solution from another bot & gave props for their win. Canadian, eh! All in all, a very nice human-like reaction. Meta AI figured that the competition just “parsed the starting digits cleaner” & asked that I type out the numbers for it next time. It felt like this bot was just a little grumpier about the outcome. But it did apologise for wasting my time & finished the conversation with a rah-rah “Let’s get it right” statement for the next time. I had already deleted the Grok conversation, so it didn’t get to add anything extra on the competitor’s win. Deepseek maintained its polite & friendly stance & apologised again for not interpreting the image well enough to provide the solution. And it offered to cross check the ChatGPT solution if I wanted to share it. Claude came back all friendly & polite again, even offering to build me a sudoku solver artifact for next time! It also acknowledged that it could be worth sticking with ChatGPT if it’s working for me. Pretty magnanimous suggestion that, eh? Finally, I felt Copilot was just a little snarky. It’s opening response was “Fair enough” when I told it of the competition’s success. Or maybe I’m just sensitive! After some other polite remarks, it restated that if I ever want to solve one properly that I should enter the numbers in a grid. The italics was from Copilot! This isn’t my perception of Copilot based on other interactions. Can a bot have a bad day!?!

All these bots are great to work & play with. Solving a sudoku puzzle from an image was just a fun comparison. They have a far wider range of capabilities. Each bot will have its own unique characteristics. Some features & capabilities may require a paid subscription. But even the free versions are wonderful tools for entertainment &, with added caution & due diligence, problem solving. They are going to become an increasingly bigger part of our lives & any excuse for learning more about them is worthwhile. So what did I learn from this little exercise?

While it’s fun comparing & contrasting these bots with different questions & challenges, I’m still wary of trusting the answers. Despite the feelings I imagine I’m experiencing as I interact with them, even they don’t pretend to have all the answers. In fact, they frequently encourage us to check alternative sources to validate their answers & suggestions. The danger is that these bots can sound very confident when answering. And they feel so personable sometimes. Real people can copy & paste, or modify, these AI answers. They too then can sound awfully confident. An added caution for when we are reading posts like this on social media.

I wonder how different a retirement plan might look from each of these guys!?! Sorry, from these tools, I mean. Tools for sure, but I can’t help but think that I’ll be giving some of them names before too long! LOL

PS … except for a few words & phrases in quotation marks, all of the above was written by an error-prone human. With feelings! Given that, you might want to cross check the information even more carefully! 😉

If you want to learn more about saving & investing, please check out Double Double Your Money, available at your local Amazon store.

Important – this is not investing, tax or legal advice, it is for entertainment & conversation-provoking purposes only. Data may not be accurate. Check the current & historical data carefully at any company’s or provider’s website, particularly where a specific product, stock or fund is mentioned. Opinions are my own & I regularly get things wrong, so do your own due diligence & seek professional advice before investing your money.

Free Meter for Weight Loss

Paul - The Wry Eye Guy 2 Comments

Free Meter for Weight Loss

Blood Glucose Monitor

It doesn’t hurt. Really!

Blood glucose monitors are devices that we tend to associate with diabetics. According to the CDC, in 1958, about 1% of the US population were diagnosed with what was then called Adult Onset Diabetes. Nowadays, the number is approaching 10% & it’s no longer just adults being diagnosed. This is along with the many more of us that are undiagnosed, or pre-diabetic. With the growing number of Type 2 diabetics, the shelves of our pharmacies display a huge range of these things, like they are the latest best-selling tech gadget for health. Even if we are fortunate enough to have avoided a diagnosis of diabetes, these monitors can be a useful tool to help us keep it that way. Along with being a useful tool to gain some insight on the impact of the foods we eat.

Many of us have impaired our natural feedback loops when it comes to eating. A diet overloaded with sugar and refined starch puts us on the path to obesity. Staying on that path can lead to metabolic syndrome and Type 2 diabetes. Checking our blood sugar levels periodically can help us identify how far down the road we are. And the results can provide some added motivation to change things. If you haven’t used a glucose monitor before, you’ll be fascinated to see what different foods do to your blood glucose levels. That big rib steak wasn’t so bad, was it? But, man, you should have seen my numbers after that pizza! And those cookies were off the chart!

While the correlation isn’t perfect, there is generally some decent relationship between blood glucose levels and insulin when it comes to carbohydrates. Among other things, insulin is released to prevent our blood sugar getting too high. While insulin first stores this energy into our muscles and liver, for more immediate use, it then stores the excess in the long term storage areas … our bellies and our bums! In other words, along with all the wonderful things it does, insulin is the fat storage hormone. This too is wonderful. But if we’re already obese, this probably isn’t what we’re looking for.

A meter won’t cure our obesity. But if you knew that a bagel or a muffin sent your blood sugar soaring, while a bacon and egg breakfast didn’t, how might you consider ordering your next morning meal? And how about that mid-morning snack of healthy yogurt that has 15g of sugar? Did you ever wonder what that might do to your blood sugar level? Keeping our blood sugar levels in the normal range is a good thing. The longer these levels are normalized, the less opportunity there is for storing more fat. A meter can help identify what foods increase our blood sugar so that we can think more carefully when choosing our next snack. An ongoing barrage of sweet treats throughout the day tends to maintain elevated insulin levels. And that may keep us in fat storage mode for the duration. That’s probably not where we want to be if we are hoping to lose weight.

In Canada, the manufacturers offer a “free” monitor with the purchase of a large box of 100 strips. Insurers may also cover the costs of meters and strips if you have a prescription. Most manufacturers have apps that link to their monitors now too. That can be good information to take along to your next doctor’s appointment.

A glucose monitor can be a relatively inexpensive tool to help us understand how our bodies interact with different foods. And it can help us reconstruct our diet to better achieve our goals.

I’d like to think that, one day, I will have repaired my natural feedback loops to the point where I no longer need an external device to tell me what my body is doing.

 

 

Let Them Eat Plastic!

Paul - The Wry Eye Guy Leave a comment

Steel Water Bottle

Let Them Eat Plastic!

I watched a CBC Marketplace show the other day. It might have been a rerun of an older one, but it was all about plastic water bottles. We’ve all heard the horrible stories about plastic in the ocean impacting fish, whales, and so on but this one was about their potential impact on us. The show folk ran around buying brand name water from four cities across Canada and they brought them all to McGill University, in Montreal. Here, they ran tests on them to see if there were tiny plastic particles in the water we like to drink.

There were! It turned out these particles, though to a lesser extent, were in some glass bottled waters too.

For the most part, I choose to drink tap water. It runs through the filter on my fridge. Though I often hit the reset button on the change light when it comes up, rather than change the filter right away. As it turns out, some of these commercial water bottles are filled with tap water too. Sure, it’s filtered while being bottle but, sometimes, we’re just paying a silly price for tap water. And the environmentally unfriendly plastic bottle comes along for the ride. Who knew!

It seems that there’s so much of this stuff going around these days, & not just from water bottles, that it shows up in our oceans, lakes and rivers. And they can detect them in the fish we eat. So are we now eating and drinking micro-plastic particles?

Now nobody really knew if these plastic particles were doing us any harm. But that’s sometimes the case with such things, often for years, and then all hell breaks lose. While they figure all that out, we might be better off not drinking water coming in plastic bottles. It’s not that I have 100% faith in the water quality coming from our municipalities either. But if the bottled water is coming from the same source, but with added plastic particles, I think I’ll stick with the regular tap water for the most part.

I guess I’m a bit of a closet tree-hugger. I’m far too macho to be going around openly trying to save the planet. I want to pillage it and get rich! But while I do that, I’m going to dig out my stainless steel water bottle to remain hydrated! 🙂

Now I’m worried about the poor folk at the water bottling plant being out of work. Modern living is way too complex sometimes.

Note from yesterday’s post … the debreceni sausage wasn’t to my taste. I’ve had really good debreceni before, it’s just this one that I didn’t like. The recipe, however, was good so I’ll try it again with another sausage. Regardless, and in retribution, I behaved really badly afterwards. I ate lots of sea salt & caramel chocolate bark with my cherry ice cream. Twice! Oops!!!