Tag investing

Declutter an Investment Portfolio

Paul - The Wry Eye Guy Leave a comment
A tidy portfolio can deliver growth or income with less work!

Managing a bag of stocks & ETFs is difficult. The fund companies have come up with products that have the potential to take away much of this pain. The all-equity ETFs & the all-in-one asset allocation ETFs offer a complete portfolio, wrapped in a single ticker symbol. Of course, no matter how good these products are, there might be some emotional investing needs too. Investing is both mathematical and psychological, eh? So maybe a little tweaking is okay!

Owning an ETF like BMO’s ZEQT (or iShares XEQT, VEQT from Vanguard Canada, etc.) is probably a good core choice for many investors. An ETF like this is already globally diversified. It’s geographically weighted according to market size & importance. It includes what many consider to be a reasonable home country bias. It holds large, mid, & small cap companies. It’s a really big haystack that I think Jack Bogle would approve of. According to Nobel Prize winning economist, Harry Markowitz, diversification is the only free lunch in investing. These funds meet that bar too. And finally, it’s a simple approach that is a lot less work for a DIY investor.

Do you spend your time figuring out if you should be dumping some of the tech ETF, so you can buy more of the gold one? Or trying to figure out when you should be selling the US market off, in order to buy Europe & Asia? Are you trying to work out what to do with this week’s hot & cold stocks? Worried about sector ETFs that might be going in, or out, of favour? Surging or failing markets? It’s all quite stressful & time consuming, eh? Life is too short. Especially as we get older! An ageing brain needs some challenge. But not torture. The globally diversified funds have everything in there. Some stuff will go up, some will go down. These funds are diversified & that’s how they work. And there’s one other important point to simplicity: if there’s a chance that the investing manager of a couple might depart first, a decluttered portfolio might be greatly appreciated by the surviving partner. The simpler the investing solution in place, the better it’s likely to be.

Want bonds? Choose one of the all-in-one ETFs (ZGRO, XBAL, VCNS, etc.) with a bond allocation that matches your needs. These are very simple solutions for highly diversified, asset-allocated portfolios, & they come with built-in rebalancing. Some investors might prefer an all-equity ETF that is complemented by separate bond & cash-like ETFs. There are some good arguments for breaking out the bond & cash allocations. It’s a little extra work, but it may make sense for some.

Now different investors have different approaches, so it’s not just about growth & accumulation. Fortunately, there is often a simple solution for many of the other investing styles too. For example, an income investor that favours high yield funds can choose something like the EQCL ETF, from Global X Canada, for the equity portion of their portfolio. It’s very similar in asset mix to the all-equity configuration of ZEQT. But instead of focusing on growth, this fund uses covered calls & leverage to drive a far higher distribution. People are different. Some are happy to go for maximum growth & sell off shares for income. Others prefer that the fund company delivers a bigger income stream for them. Rather than selling shares, these people are more comfortable figuring out how much of the big distribution they need to reinvest, in order to sustain & grow that income stream. Some investors like to mix & match such strategies. There are those who use different strategies in different accounts, so one style will be used in the TFSA & another in the RRSP. If you are new to these income funds, note that there are some total return & tax characteristics that are different to the regular type. Take the time to learn before diving in. Though that suggestion applies to everything. And it should have previously applied to the messy portfolios we sometimes find ourselves with! LOL

BMO offers yet another approach with their T6 Series ETFs. These funds dole out a targeted 6% distribution with funds like ZGRO.T & ZBAL.T. Here the fund manager is delivering the extra income, primarily via return of capital, but without the investor having to manage the sale of shares. This is cool for those who think that the 4% Rule isn’t allowing them to spend as much as they’d like. But it’s not as biased towards the far higher distributions that come from some of the high yield funds. This is more of a middle ground for income seekers. Don’t assume that this 6% distribution is a given for an inflation beating income stream for a full retirement lifecycle, by the way. Read this post on the Safe Withdrawal Rate in Retirement on why that might not work all the time. Nonetheless, the T6 funds will take care of automatically delivering a higher monthly yield, based on the value of the underlying fund at the end of the previous year. You still need to pay attention to the variability of the income stream over time. There may be a need to reinvest a little extra when income goes up after a great year, for example. That might safeguard against an income drop if the markets go down the following year. If the fund is subject to successive down years, the income stream will decline too. No solution is perfect when we try to predict the future, eh? But the bottom line is that simpler solutions exist for most investing styles & strategies. And for varying levels of distributions. Regardless of the investing strategy that is preferred, it shouldn’t stop an investor exploring ways to tidy up a messy & confusing portfolio. Especially if it reduces stress, while improving visibility & returns. Decluttering can be both refreshing & potentially rewarding.

If you can’t get your head around having so few holdings, how about putting the BMO one (ZEQT) in the RRSP, the iShares one (XEQT) in the TFSA, & Vanguard’s (VEQT) in the non-registered. Each one of these is globally diversified. They own a little piece of everything traded on the public markets. These are all essentially identical. But I get it. I totally feel the need to spread it around the different fund companies myself! There is also something to be said for making the single ticker solutions the core of a portfolio. While leaving a smaller allocation available for some gambling on the side. Sorry, I meant some intelligent macro investing on the side to boost alpha! If you know you can do it well, or if you can afford the greater uncertainty of return for a small part of the portfolio, then it might be fun, no it’s still crazy, okay! 😜

One other consideration. If the current messy portfolio performance is seriously lagging that of a single ticker solution, ask why. There may be good reasons why. And good reasons to justify staying the course with existing investments. But if we can’t come up with good answers (that aren’t guesswork or wishful thinking!), then consider this … if a portfolio is consistently underperforming the single ticker ETFs by an amount that is significantly more than 1%, it might be better off in the hands of an advisor who only charges 1% to manage the portfolio. Even if all the advisor does is invest it all into ZEQT or VBAL & manage the financial planning & cashflows for the investor thereafter!

There is also one big caution with all this. Decluttering a portfolio isn’t like spring cleaning at home. Do NOT rush into selling a bunch of stuff without getting some professional tax & investing advice. A long-term holding in a non-registered account, for example, may have significant capital gains tax liability if sold off. It might bump income up to a higher tax bracket. It might generate income that exceeds an OAS clawback limit, & so on. There are many potential issues, so seeking professional help is often the best course. There can be other challenges with balancing different fund types across the different account types. If you don’t know how to manage all this, get some help. Even if you’re just not sure if you know enough to manage all this, get some help first!

If you want to learn more about saving & investing, please check out Double Double Your Money, available at your local Amazon store.

Important – this is not investing, tax or legal advice, it is for entertainment & conversation-provoking purposes only. Data may not be accurate. Check the current & historical data carefully at any company’s or provider’s website, particularly where a specific product, stock or fund is mentioned. Opinions are my own & I regularly get things wrong, so do your own due diligence & seek professional advice before investing your money.

Beware of Advice from Recent Retirees!

Paul - The Wry Eye Guy Leave a comment
Gambling on Retirement!

It’s unfair to tarnish all retirees with that statement, some might be offering great advice. But I’d be a little more circumspect about advice from those retirees advocating for earlier retirement because of their recent success. Some of these well-meaning folk might be suffering from recency bias. What’s that?

Anyone retiring in the past 15 years, with big stock market exposure, has probably been pretty lucky. Or, as they might prefer to see it … they are brilliant investors! This is especially true if their portfolio was biased towards the US markets. S&P500 Index® funds have returned close to 14% annually. The tech heavy Nasdaq 100 Index® has done even better.
I have to admit, some of them do look like investing geniuses!

Over the past decade & a half, it almost didn’t matter what strategy was employed. Just about any broad based American equity funds worked well. The growth investor did well & dividend investors did well. Investors who choose funds delivering huge yields via covered calls & partial leverage did well. They are all still doing well. Some of these retirees are mocking the old 4% Rule. As they sip frozen margaritas on a beach in the Caribbean! They are having a ball. And it’s hard to argue with success. But this might not apply to the next batch of retirees. And those with more limited finances need to be especially careful.

The 4% Rule is not a rule, it’s a rule of thumb. A guide only. But there are good reasons for its existence. Reasons that are at least broadly acknowledged by most. In a “normal” world, the safe withdrawal rate of 4% generally worked. In the “modern” world, it seems like you can haul out 12 or 13% every year & ride that gravy train all the way to the bank. Or the beach! That’s been the story for anyone retiring from 2010 onwards. The few blips we had along the way, like the one earlier this year, another in 2022, the 2020 downdraft for covid. They all repaired so quickly that nobody really noticed these as bad events. In fact, all those rapid blips did was reinforce the “buy the dip” philosophy. And, for those who didn’t panic, that has worked out very well.

But there will almost certainly come a time, where the dips will hurt a little more than these recent examples. There will be more enduring dips. And in such times, the 4% withdrawal rate may be more appropriate for managing retirement income risk. Ask anyone who retired in 2000. I’m not kidding, find an older retiree & ask. You probably won’t find them on social media! The experiences of more recent retirees is not how things always were. And while the good times are still rolling, they may not continue forever.
In case you can’t track down one of those older retirees, read this post on the Safe Withdrawal Rate in Retirement.

If you were planning on saving a million bucks before retiring, but you’ve only made it to half a million so far, pause a minute. Think very, very carefully about taking any advice that suggests you can retire immediately on your half-sized stash. Some recent retirees may think it’s okay to use 10% withdrawals nowadays. Or maybe they suggest that you can buy a bunch of funds yielding 10, 12, or even 15%, & go enjoy life sooner. This might not be good advice. Remember the old investing disclaimer: past performance is not indicative of future returns? In fact, it’s more likely going to be the opposite. After such an amazingly good run of returns, it’s far more likely that future returns will not be as good.

Look, I don’t know what the future holds. Maybe these enthusiastic retirees are right. But for anyone on the threshold of retirement, or for those younger retirees with a longer retirement timeline, caution is warranted. I’m sure I would enjoy spending a little more after a really good year of returns. And I’d probably do that again the following year, if there was another good year in the bank. But I would not start out a full retirement cycle of 20 or 30 years with the expectation that 10% a year is going to be the norm. While it’s not a commandment, I would treat that 4% Rule of Thumb with a little respect. I sure hope that we might still enjoy some good years of 5 or 6% spending. Who knows, maybe even a little more than that from time to time. Actually, let’s be honest here, I’m really hoping that 10% thing holds up for my retirement, from beginning to end! But I’m not taking that optimistic hope to the bank for the long haul. It’s probably not going to work as a good financial planning number!

If you can’t figure this all out on your own, please see a qualified financial planner & step through the process carefully with them. They will help you figure out how much you need to save to retire. And how much you might be able to spend during retirement. I know it’s expensive to work with a financial planner, but it might prove to be money well spent. Rather than finding out that you got it wrong half way through retirement.

If you want to learn more about saving & investing, please check out Double Double Your Money, available at your local Amazon store.

Important – this is not investing, tax or legal advice, it is for entertainment & conversation-provoking purposes only. Data may not be accurate. Check the current & historical data carefully at any company’s or provider’s website, particularly where a specific product, stock or fund is mentioned. Opinions are my own & I regularly get things wrong, so do your own due diligence & seek professional advice before investing your money.

DIY Investing or Work With a Financial Advisor?

Paul - The Wry Eye Guy Leave a comment
Good old-fashioned financial advice.
But at what price?

DIY investing can drive you a little crazy. Do you like the crazy? Are you enjoying the work that comes with portfolio management? Some of us do! But it gets a little more challenging when we need to withdraw money during retirement. And will a surviving spouse be able to carry on with the crazy portfolio in the event the “money manager” departs first? Are you a good DIY investor? Or would you do better with an advisor?

There is an easy way to figure out if you should consider paying a fee to have a professional manage your portfolio & the retirement cashflow stream for you.
And it’s this …

Compare your DIY portfolio performance against an equivalent ETF. We all need a “benchmark” to check our portfolio against. If you’re 100% in globally diversified stocks, for example, compare your portfolio performance to that of one of the XEQT, ZEQT, VEQT all-equity ETFs. If you’re in a 60/40 stock & fixed income mix, compare your DIY portfolio performance against XBAL, ZBAL, or VBAL. Are you buying a mix of Canadian & US large-cap stocks? Then compare that to an appropriately allocated portfolio of VFV & XIU ETFs. A portfolio filled with way too many stocks & ETFs might also be usefully compared against one of the all-in-ones. If your portfolio performance lags its benchmark by 1% or more, you might want to consider handing it over to a financial manager.

As an aside, since some of these all-in-one funds are so new, you may need to break them down into their constituent ETFs to usefully use them for benchmarking over longer time periods. The longer the history, the more useful the insights.

I’m using 1% here because many financial advisors charge an annual 1% of portfolio value as a fee for managing a portfolio. Is that fee worth it? Get the advisor’s performance history & compare that to an equivalent benchmark ETF too. Their recommended portfolio should only lag the return performance of those ETFs by the 1% fee. If they meet that requirement and if your self-managed portfolio was lagging by more than 1%, you could be getting better results by paying the advisor the 1% fee. As a bonus, you’ll have less work & an advisor who will tell you that everything will be okay when the markets are imploding. Hand-holding is included in their fee! For retirees, the advisor may also plan the income strategy & tax-efficiently manage the cashflow for you, across all accounts. You might even get some estate planning advice along the way. If you have a good advisor, they can deliver a lot of value. Even if they underperform the market average by the amount of the fee they charge.

Can you find an advisor that will consistently beat, after fees, the market or benchmark returns? I don’t know, but be sure to review their data supporting this opinion very carefully. And not necessarily against the benchmark provided by the advisor.

Unfortunately, it can be pretty challenging to tell if an advisor is any good. And those investors who are most challenged by DIY investing will also be challenged by the process of choosing a good advisor. We all like to believe we have the best doctor taking care of our health. In reality, most of them will be closer to average than exceptional. Fortunately, there are minimum standards & qualifications that we hope will ensure an adequate level of service from these professionals. The same is only variably true for financial advisors. Because the qualifications for calling yourself a financial advisor in Canada are variable. Some advisors are closer to being a product salesperson. And while some feel or profess a fiduciary responsibility, it is not a legal duty or obligation for many. They cannot just take your money & head off to a beach somewhere, but they may be putting their own, or their company’s, interests just slightly ahead of yours when it comes to investment choices. Even if only subconsciously.

Of course, a good salesperson will make you feel better about the relationship you are getting into. And that’s not a bad thing. But you also need an advisor who can at least deliver average market returns for a broadly diversified portfolio. Minus the fees. And you do need to know exactly how much you’re paying for whatever services & products are being recommended! There may be advisory fees and product fees, check carefully.

If you are a balanced 60/40 style investor, what would you think of paying an advisor to put all your money into ZBAL? Or maybe 60% into XEQT, with the other 40% into a couple of bond & HISA-type ETFs? We sometimes resent paying for simplicity. Advisors know this & are less likely to present you with such a simple portfolio solution. After all, if things are that simple, why would we need an advisor!
Yet, in DIY mode, we sometimes struggle to follow the simple path ourselves. Instead, we prefer to work hard creating a portfolio that underperforms!

Of course, that simple solution might not be the ideal path for everyone. There may well be good reasons for some investors to pursue a lower volatility strategy, a higher income strategy, or whatever. But it is still useful to compare the total return on our own portfolios against those of low-cost, market index ETFs.

Robo-advisors are trying to bridge the gap between the advisory space & DIY, typically for about a 0.5% fee premium, in addition to ETF fees. I love the idea but it feels like you’re paying the added fee for the robo to pick the same ETFs that are in the all-in-one ETFs. Like some human services, they can fancy it up with one or two more esoteric picks. So you feel like you’re getting something extra for your money. But you generally won’t get the more valuable hand-holding that comes with the more expensive advisory services. Maybe AI will help with this down the road. But AI has been around for a lot longer than current market noise suggests & it hasn’t happened yet. Some robo-services do include human phone support. That might develop & grow into something more valuable going forward.

Isn’t there scope for fee reduction on the human advisory side too? Or for a service with a far more rapidly declining tiered fee-structure for larger portfolios? Are there any low-cost advisors out there? Shouldn’t there be more advisors competing with the 0.5% fees of the robo-advisors. Simpler portfolio advice & management should come with lower fees, no? I’m okay with portfolios constructed with low cost index funds. For some investors, the greater value may be more in managing asset location (what ETF goes in which account) & retirement cashflow. Some advisors include financial planning, a valuable service too. But can it be done for a 0.5% fee? Or less?

I realise that someone else’s job always looks easier than it really is from the outside. But I think financial advisory (& real estate) fees are very expensive in Canada. Particularly for the cookie-cutter portfolios offered by some companies. I’m totally okay with the right cookie-cutter portfolio, I just don’t want to pay through the nose for it. High fees are an ignorance premium being levied on a population that didn’t get this kind of knowledge coming through our educational system. And our schools still don’t prepare kids for the digital environment that now makes it far easier for the DIY investor to learn things the hard way. Fees will likely drop over time, as education & AI combine to work at improving the competitive landscape. Though in traditional Canadian fashion, it’ll probably drag out for a long time yet. And some of us older folk might not live long enough to benefit! 🤪

Regardless of the path we choose, it’s worth occasionally benchmarking our portfolio performance against a low-cost, well-diversified, ETF portfolio. One that approximately matches our portfolio’s asset allocation. Benchmarking can provide insight on how decent a job we’re doing with our investing strategy. And if we’re not doing such a good job ourselves, it may be worth talking to a financial advisor. But if you still find the idea of paying an advisor distasteful, then you’d better figure out how to learn to do it better on your own. Or maybe just use the benchmark ETFs instead!

If you want to learn more about saving & investing from the ground up, I’d like to suggest that you check out Double Double Your Money, available at your local Amazon store.

Important – this is not investing, tax or legal advice, it is for entertainment & conversation-provoking purposes only. Data may not be accurate. Check the current & historical data carefully at any company’s or provider’s website, particularly where a specific product, stock or fund is mentioned. Opinions are my own & I regularly get things wrong, so do your own due diligence & seek professional advice before investing your money.

DIY Financial Planning … Is it for You?

Paul - The Wry Eye Guy 2 Comments
Retirement Planning Made Easy!

I’m jumping the gun on this one, but I’m so excited to have stumbled across this financial planning tool that I want to share it with you now. Funny enough, Microsoft’s Copilot chatbot introduced me to this. I asked Copilot to help with a financial plan & after providing some insights & encouragement, the first link it provided was to planeasy.ca. This led me to their financial planning platform adviice.ca. While I’ve only played with it for a few hours yet, I’m really excited about what these guys are doing. And what this platform can do for DIY investors who are also doing DIY financial planning.

One of the drivers for DIY investors to do the DIY thing is our frugal nature. We want to save on investment & advisory fees so that we keep more of our money. That may, or may not, work out well for us, but we just can’t escape the desire to be frugal. This frugal nature also extends to financial planning. Though many DIY investors recognise the value of a financial plan, we tend not to want to pay the fee for having a plan done professionally. And no wonder, it’s not difficult to find fees in the two to five thousand dollar range for having a single financial plan prepared by a professional. Despite the value, that’s still a lot of coin for a one-shot deal. I’m not sure what plan revisions would cost in subsequent years, but it’s fair to assume that as time goes by & circumstances change, it probably makes sense to have the plan updated periodically.

Enter Adviice.ca!

If you’ve watched YouTube® videos on financial planning, you’ll have seen them use software for those sexy charts & graphs that are easily modified for viewing different scenarios. We know we want this, but the software isn’t available to non-professionals in many cases. And some of us are unwilling to pay the price for the professional to do a plan. The Adviice.ca platform costs $9 for a 30 day trial. And $9 a month if you decide to keep the subscription. At these prices, that’s almost 28 years of DIY financial planning for the same cost as one $3,000 plan! There are so many threads to weaving an accumulation or retirement plan. It is very difficult to do it on a notepad or with spreadsheets. Adviice does the calculation grunt work in the background & shows the results in an easy-to-read visual format. It’s also updated to reflect current details on taxation, government income streams, etc. At this point, I haven’t played with the platform for long enough to write a review. Frankly, I’m not qualified to do a real review anyway. The best I could do is provide a DIY appraisal of what I’ve found. However, this post is more about my early enthusiastic reaction to finding it & using it.

Within 2 hours of signing up for this platform, I had a rough-tuned retirement plan done. Much of that time was spent inputting the foundational data. It took another couple of hours to learn enough about how it worked to improve on the first pass. This particular plan embraces a situation that covers another three or four years of working, reviewing different RRSP drawdown strategies, looking at the tax implications of different withdrawal rates across different account types, & so on. I still have much to learn & a lot of fine-tuning to do, but I think I’ve got a pretty respectable financial plan pulled together already. Now the beauty of this is that you can spend as long as you want fine-tuning a plan. Or, to avoid the law of diminishing returns, you can book a one hour session with an advisor at Planeasy, or with other professionals using the platform. You can do this right within the Adviice platform. And for only $499! Or you can book a more comprehensive package for $1,999.00, which could include multiple retirement scenarios, additional tuning sessions, etc. The beauty of this offering is that you can do the DIY thing at a low cost, but then you can add some professional assessment at a lower price than the typical financial planning service might cost. Along with pandering to the hands-on thing favoured by many DIY folk, this could be a cost-effective combination of DIY & professional advice.

Rather than share screenshots, which won’t capture the full scope of what this platform really does, here’s a link to a PlanEasy YouTube® video that covers one example of doing a retirement plan for a couple. It captures a lot of the features & functionality of the system. If you’ve watched financial planning videos in the past, you’ll find a lot you can relate to in this. This clip shows the software with the green PlanEasy branding, mine has the blue Adviice branding, but is otherwise identical. Though there may be some additional features on the latest version. It’s not yet a perfect solution for all scenarios. I’d like to try scenarios where I pass away earlier than my spouse, for example. You can work around most of these limitations by manually adjusting the data columns, but it looks like they are working on improving the functionality & adding features on an ongoing basis. I joined their Reddit® group (r/adviice) where you’ll see feature requests & the company’s responses to these. They are really quick to respond to questions.

The biggest limitation to the client version that I’ve seen, so far, is that we can only create one foundational data set. In other words, short of starting over, we can only do our own plan, for a single or a couple. And that’s fair enough. The advisors pay more & can obviously prepare plans for multiple clients. For those who take advantage of a session with an advisor, the advisors can then use our base plans to add their professional input on top of ours. I guess part of the reason we can get the lower cost professional oversight is because we have already done the work to build the foundational data set. We can still, however, create multiple scenarios based on our own foundational data set. That allows us to explore different accumulation & withdrawal strategies, & so on.
The other limitation is that we cannot create reports. Those are delivered to us after a session with an Adviice advisor. That too is fair. It would be possible to change the foundational data to create reports for others if this was open. Just doing the DIY thing for ourselves, we can get all the relevant info right on the screen. And we can export the plan’s data, for those who want to play with the numbers in a spreadsheet. The reports are not essential for getting value from this software.

Bottom line is that I think this is the first affordable solution that is accessible for Canadians who want to be more involved in creating their own financial plan. Not only is it more affordable to begin with, but it may offer access to professional planning & fine tuning at a more affordable price too. It is a really smart product approach from this company. I think they will find many takers at $9 a month that might otherwise never have spent a penny on financial planning. And I think many of those takers will avail of the tune-up sessions with a professional advisor. And there will be those who will take advantage of the larger, more comprehensive professional support packages too. I hate this way-overused phrase, but this product has all the feel of one of those really good win-win solutions!

If I’m sounding like I work for these guys, I apologise, but I have absolutely no affiliation. I found it last weekend & I ponied up the $9 within 10 minutes of reading about it. Within an hour of playing with it, I knew this was going to be an enjoyable experience. When I compare the number of hours I spend with calculators & spreadsheets trying to do all this, Adviice is a great option for me. However, learning anything new does require some brain activity. And it might not be suitable for everyone. Of course, we all know that we need to challenge our brains as we age. And learning to use this will certainly exercise the brain.
In my case, that might be a bonus! 😜

Despite my enthusiasm, I would also strongly caution against using this as the total solution to a problem that you might not fully understand. If you don’t know enough to have confidence in your current DIY financial plan, you might not know enough to understand if the results produced by Adviice are good enough to live by. Particularly when it comes to depending on a plan that needs to survive your retirements years. I know I’ll enjoy playing & refining a plan with these tools going forward. But I will also take advantage of a one hour session with a professional down the road. Just in case I’ve screwed it up.
Please be careful here!
It may turn out that this product is not suitable for you. But if you enjoy doing this kind of thing, & if you are spending a lot of time with spreadsheets & online calculators, I highly recommend investing the $9 to test drive it.

While I have focused on the older demographic in the course of this conversation, this is also of potential value for the young accumulator.
At long last, there is almost an app for this stuff! LOL

A more recent update on using the Adviice.ca platform can be found at DIY Financial Planning… An Update

If you want to learn more about saving & investing from the ground up, I’d like to suggest that you check out Double Double Your Money, available at your local Amazon store.

Important – this is not investing, tax or legal advice, it is for entertainment & conversation-provoking purposes only. Data may not be accurate. Check the current & historical data carefully at any company’s or provider’s website, particularly where a specific product, stock or fund is mentioned. Opinions are my own & I regularly get things wrong, so do your own due diligence & seek professional advice before investing your money.

Canadian Banks for Dividend or Covered Call Income?

Paul - The Wry Eye Guy 1 Comment
Dollars & Dividends

We love our dividends in Canada. If dividends are so great, why not go for the even greater yields available with covered call ETFs? Maybe we can toss all our investments into covered call ETFs & retire early? That sounds great!
But does it work?

Maybe!

Every investing strategy has its fan base. But at the end of the day, it all comes down to how the numbers work for the individual investor. And covered call ETFs can work for some investors.

However, some features of covered call writing can be less appealing. The notion of covered call ETFs having lower volatility, for example, may be true. But volatility is a measure of an investment going up, as well as down. In general, covered calls will limit upside. If a growing stock is called away, you lose some of the upside. As investors, we don’t mind volatility if it means our investment is going up. We only fret when it goes down. Hand in hand with that is the idea that covered call writing offers some downside protection. You’ll notice the wording in the description of many funds says something like downside protection may be limited to the returns provided by the covered call premium. That’s marketing speak for “we can crash as hard as anything else but you’re at least getting that juicy covered call premium along the way”. Unfortunately, during times of growth or recovery, the capped upside often means that the growth of a covered call fund doesn’t match that of a fund holding the equities directly.

Let’s take a look at an example using only Canada’s big banks. The five largest banks in Canada all started paying dividends in the 1800s. That’s a little too far back to look at, but if you’d invested $100k in an equal-weight holding of the Big 6 banks back in January 2000, that portfolio would have grown to almost one & a half million dollars today! Investing in the large cap American or Canadian market index funds would only have returned under half a million over that time. Of course, nobody would risk going all in on just the Canadian banks. Right!?! But this kind of performance is why Canadians like their banks.

To compare the different investing strategies, I’ll use BMO’s ZEB & ZWB here. Both ETFs are designed to track the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. And both funds are managed by BMO Global Asset Management, one of Canada’s largest ETF providers. ZEB just holds the banks. ZWB holds the same banks, but adds a covered call strategy to about 50% of the portfolio to generate a bigger income stream. These ETFs have a relatively short shared history, so we’re only looking at returns over an 11.5 year period up to the middle of this year here.

Accumulation
During the accumulation years, all dividends & distributions are reinvested, that’s the “DRIP ON” scenario in the table below. This shows the Total Return, with dividends reinvested, from a $100k investment directly in the bank stocks. And it compares that to the same $100k investment in ZEB & ZWB.

It’s probably no surprise that directly investing in the stocks produced the greatest return. The direct investment was rebalanced semi-annually, to match the index tracking guidelines used by the ETFs. While ZEB does all that work for us, the fees charged by the fund cause a little drag on the returns. Since covered call writing lops off some of the upside potential, it’s also not a surprise to see ZWB trailing the pack here. It’s CAGR & Best Year are poorer. But, it’s worth noting that it’s Worst Year is slightly worse than the other two. Fund managers do warn that covered call funds “may” provide downside protection. Sometimes, that might only be by the amount of the covered call premium. But it’s not a guarantee. Since ZWB had the biggest drop of the three, the covered call strategy didn’t provide much of a safety net during the covid crash of March 2020. It’s possible that longer periods of sideways, or slightly down, markets could have allowed ZWB to produce a better relative performance. All in all though, it’s a pretty good performance for all strategies. That’s the accumulation picture. Next we’ll look at what happens when we start spending the income.

Spending the Money
Things change when we retire & need to spend some of our savings every year. All sorts of new challenges come up. The ideal scenario for many retirees is to have their investments generate enough dividends & distributions for them to live on. No worries about having to sell shares in a down market, & so on. Here’s how these three investments deliver on the income front.

This table shows the picture for an investor who retired in 2012 & sucked out all the dividends & distributions for living expenses along the way. The holder of ZWB would have had more income over the 11.5 year period. Though overall, perhaps not the best value, since the value of the underlying portfolio didn’t grow as much as the other two. If an emergency situation forced the sale of some shares to raise capital, the other two approaches had far bigger portfolio values to draw from. Aside from the income, the positive thing about all these results is that the underlying assets continued to appreciate. All these ETFs show positive CAGR. And this is with all the dividends & distributions taken out. BMO’s limited covered call strategy, over this timeline, worked well. Any income investment that shows negative CAGR for the underlying assets (with DRIP off) might be an exposure for a retiree with a longer time horizon. The portfolio value would decline over time & that will have an impact on the income stream over the long haul too. There is one other exposure here & that is the impact of inflation. If we adjust the End Value of the portfolios in the above table, the Big 6 & ZEB are worth an inflation-adjusted amount of about $150k. The End Value of ZWH, in 2012 dollars, is just under $95k at the end. This isn’t quite accurate, as the inflation adjustment comes from US inflation data, not Canadian. But it still shows the importance of having a portfolio capable of staying ahead of inflation.

Here’s what the income streams look like for these investments …

While ZWB starts out with a far greater annual income than the other two options, it shows more variability than the other two. Variability of income from year to year can be an issue for some retirees. Perhaps more importantly, the other income streams are catching up as time goes by. Direct investing shows a more consistent upward trajectory, even without any additional investment or DRIP. And this is exactly what you’d hope for with a portfolio of dividend-growth stocks. The dividend growth is what grows the income stream. That can be very important for an investor with a longer expected time horizon in retirement. Early retirees should watch out for this.

The Canadian banks generally do well over time. For portfolio growth & for growth of income. But now it’s down to personal choice. Do you prefer to trade some long-term portfolio value for the bigger income stream of the covered call approach early in retirement? Or do you like the more consistent growth of the income stream that comes from a portfolio biased towards dividend growth? There are a lot of factors that go into individual decisions. For a young investor with a long time horizon, total return is probably going to be more important than the size of the income stream starting out. It might also be more important for an early retiree. Or for a healthy retiree with a longer life expectancy. Things like leaving an inheritance, planning for home care or a retirement home, & so on, all factor into the decision making process too. Regardless, the Canadian banks have been a pretty solid investment over time & they look good in all these scenarios. Of course, as you’ll find noted on every fund’s webpage … past performance is not indicative of future results! We can’t just assume an investment will continue to do well in the future because it’s done well in the past. The banks have been great performers historically. But not all stocks or funds perform as well as the banks did here. Be sure to compare your choices for total return & income growth. And not just the size of the yield!

If you want to learn more about all this from the ground up, I’d like to suggest that you check out Double Double Your Money, available at your local Amazon store.

Important – this is not investing, tax or legal advice, it is for entertainment & educational purposes only. Opinions are my own, so do your own due diligence & seek professional advice before investing your money.