Tag retirement income

Asset Allocation ETFs are like Pasta!

Paul - The Wry Eye Guy Leave a comment
Portfolios & Pasta!

Many years ago we visited some Italian friends for dinner. That was the first time I realised that pasta wasn’t meant to have a couple of pounds of stew heaped on top of it. Pasta in our house was usually over-boiled spaghetti, buried under lots of meaty-tomatoey stuff. Sometimes, we tossed in a few tablespoons of curry powder. Or maybe some jalapeños. And left-over spuds were always a no-brainer addition. Look, I’m not saying I didn’t enjoy some of these concoctions. But I was totally taken aback by how much I truly enjoyed the far simpler pasta that we experienced at our friends’ house. Portfolios are a bit like pasta in that respect. Sometimes, we can get carried away by having too many ingredients to choose from. Simpler can be better.

BlackRock’s iShares XGRO (20% fixed income) & XBAL (40% fixed income) have been available as all-in-one portfolio solutions since 2007. The arrival of the all-equity ETFs boosted interest in these off-the-shelf portfolios. In 2019, Vanguard Canada launched VEQT, their all-equity ETF. In that same year, the iShares XEQT ETF & Horizons (now Global X Canada) HEQT were also launched. And in 2022 we got BMO’s ZEQT. These funds are globally diversified, with about 45% of the allocation going to the US, 30% to Canada, & the remainder going to International, which includes a small allocation to emerging markets. These ETFs hold 10,000, or more, different company stocks from around the globe. That is some kind of diversification! And according to Harry Markowitz, a Nobel Prize-winning economist, diversification is the only free lunch in investing. There are a bunch of academic papers that support this level of diversification. While there are minor squabbles about percentages, or how great the American market is, I think some of us could benefit from using the allocation model employed by these highly diversified ETFs. Of course, that won’t stop us trying to mess with a good recipe from time to time, eh?

My own portfolio has gone through changes over the years. I was a growth investor at one time. Later, a dividend growth investor. Over time, new ETFs made it easier to chase the next hot sector or geography, so I started adding some of those. It wasn’t long before my portfolio looked more like one of my mad Irish-Indian-Mexican, & only vaguely Italian, pasta dishes! I finally got around to doing pasta the Italian way. It took me a little longer to learn how to apply that same keep-it-simple philosophy to my portfolio. But both cooking & investing are a little easier now. I will, however, admit that I occasionally toss a little hot pepper, or a little hot stock, into the recipe too!

Regardless of your preferred investment philosophy, there’s probably an all-in-one solution out there for you now. Along with the 100% equity ETFs, if you want 20% bonds, there are the V/X/ZGRO ETFs. The V/X/ZBAL ETFs cover the 40% bond allocation model. And so on. If you want the fund managers to take care of selling shares for you for income, BMO now has the T Series ETFs, like ZGRO-T & ZBAL-T. These ETFs dispense monthly income at the rate of 6% annualised. Now this distribution is well supported by recent market performance, but you should consult a professional to see if that 6% spending rate is sustainable throughout a lengthy retirement. Global X launched some funds for the high income investor. In 2023, EQCL provided a covered call & leveraged ETF that pays out at about a 12% rate. This sounds like a dream ETF &, since it was launched, it has been. Along with the fantastically high distribution, the underlying share price has continued to grow. But a 12% withdrawal rate might not be a safe bet for anyone starting out with a long retirement horizon. To complement this, Global X also have a globally diversified ETF with only covered calls. And another with only some leverage. What’s your favourite flavour?

With any fund that deviates from just holding & compounding plain old company stocks, it’s worth comparing its total return performance against an equivalent regular version. Regardless of huge differences in yield, total return comparisons offer a very useful perspective on relative performance. This is important to review during different parts of the market cycle. Many of these new funds look good, but they’ve only been active during a period of generally great market growth. Or with some smaller shocks that recovered quickly. Comparisons of these newer funds over recent shorter timelines are not as useful. Be wary of overly optimistic expectations until there’s some history of performance during longer or more severe downturns. Maybe these funds will do well. But getting it wrong with overly optimistic expectations can wreak havoc with retirement planning.

So what’s the message here? Having a big, sloppy, messy set of investments can add work & stress to the job of managing a portfolio. It’s worth comparing such a portfolio to the far simpler portfolios like those asset allocation ETFs we talked about above. If you are confidently outperforming an equivalent all-in-one or asset allocation fund, & if you don’t mind the work, then carry on doing what you’re doing. But if the off-the-shelf ETF is beating your portfolio over the long haul, you might want to ask why. Could the simple recipe be worth considering?

Of course you absolutely should consult a professional before you start moving investments around. There are so many things that can go wrong. You don’t want to get hit with a big tax bill from selling off investments in a taxable account, for example. Nor from shifting things between tax sheltered or tax deferred accounts incorrectly. That’s a huge no-no. Professional assistance may be required to avoid these, & other, potential pitfalls. And finally, if a big, sloppy, messy portfolio is underperforming by a significant amount, it may even be worth paying a professional to manage things. DIY investing isn’t something we’ve sworn an oath of allegiance to! At the very least, it may be worth interviewing a few financial planners & advisors, to get a feel for what they might do differently for you. Even if you decide to continue with the DIY approach, these encounters can be very educational. They may even help you create a better plan. You’ve already got a financial plan though, right?

Okay enough with all that for now, can you guess what’s for dinner tonight! 😜

If you want to learn more about saving & investing, please check out Double Double Your Money, available at your local Amazon store.

Important – this is not investing, tax or legal advice, it is for entertainment & conversation-provoking purposes only. Data may not be accurate. Check the current & historical data carefully at any company’s or provider’s website, particularly where a specific product, stock or fund is mentioned. Opinions are my own & I regularly get things wrong, so do your own due diligence & seek professional advice before investing your money.

Declutter an Investment Portfolio

Paul - The Wry Eye Guy Leave a comment
A tidy portfolio can deliver growth or income with less work!

Managing a bag of stocks & ETFs is difficult. The fund companies have come up with products that have the potential to take away much of this pain. The all-equity ETFs & the all-in-one asset allocation ETFs offer a complete portfolio, wrapped in a single ticker symbol. Of course, no matter how good these products are, there might be some emotional investing needs too. Investing is both mathematical and psychological, eh? So maybe a little tweaking is okay!

Owning an ETF like BMO’s ZEQT (or iShares XEQT, VEQT from Vanguard Canada, etc.) is probably a good core choice for many investors. An ETF like this is already globally diversified. It’s geographically weighted according to market size & importance. It includes what many consider to be a reasonable home country bias. It holds large, mid, & small cap companies. It’s a really big haystack that I think Jack Bogle would approve of. According to Nobel Prize winning economist, Harry Markowitz, diversification is the only free lunch in investing. These funds meet that bar too. And finally, it’s a simple approach that is a lot less work for a DIY investor.

Do you spend your time figuring out if you should be dumping some of the tech ETF, so you can buy more of the gold one? Or trying to figure out when you should be selling the US market off, in order to buy Europe & Asia? Are you trying to work out what to do with this week’s hot & cold stocks? Worried about sector ETFs that might be going in, or out, of favour? Surging or failing markets? It’s all quite stressful & time consuming, eh? Life is too short. Especially as we get older! An ageing brain needs some challenge. But not torture. The globally diversified funds have everything in there. Some stuff will go up, some will go down. These funds are diversified & that’s how they work. And there’s one other important point to simplicity: if there’s a chance that the investing manager of a couple might depart first, a decluttered portfolio might be greatly appreciated by the surviving partner. The simpler the investing solution in place, the better it’s likely to be.

Want bonds? Choose one of the all-in-one ETFs (ZGRO, XBAL, VCNS, etc.) with a bond allocation that matches your needs. These are very simple solutions for highly diversified, asset-allocated portfolios, & they come with built-in rebalancing. Some investors might prefer an all-equity ETF that is complemented by separate bond & cash-like ETFs. There are some good arguments for breaking out the bond & cash allocations. It’s a little extra work, but it may make sense for some.

Now different investors have different approaches, so it’s not just about growth & accumulation. Fortunately, there is often a simple solution for many of the other investing styles too. For example, an income investor that favours high yield funds can choose something like the EQCL ETF, from Global X Canada, for the equity portion of their portfolio. It’s very similar in asset mix to the all-equity configuration of ZEQT. But instead of focusing on growth, this fund uses covered calls & leverage to drive a far higher distribution. People are different. Some are happy to go for maximum growth & sell off shares for income. Others prefer that the fund company delivers a bigger income stream for them. Rather than selling shares, these people are more comfortable figuring out how much of the big distribution they need to reinvest, in order to sustain & grow that income stream. Some investors like to mix & match such strategies. There are those who use different strategies in different accounts, so one style will be used in the TFSA & another in the RRSP. If you are new to these income funds, note that there are some total return & tax characteristics that are different to the regular type. Take the time to learn before diving in. Though that suggestion applies to everything. And it should have previously applied to the messy portfolios we sometimes find ourselves with! LOL

BMO offers yet another approach with their T6 Series ETFs. These funds dole out a targeted 6% distribution with funds like ZGRO.T & ZBAL.T. Here the fund manager is delivering the extra income, primarily via return of capital, but without the investor having to manage the sale of shares. This is cool for those who think that the 4% Rule isn’t allowing them to spend as much as they’d like. But it’s not as biased towards the far higher distributions that come from some of the high yield funds. This is more of a middle ground for income seekers. Don’t assume that this 6% distribution is a given for an inflation beating income stream for a full retirement lifecycle, by the way. Read this post on the Safe Withdrawal Rate in Retirement on why that might not work all the time. Nonetheless, the T6 funds will take care of automatically delivering a higher monthly yield, based on the value of the underlying fund at the end of the previous year. You still need to pay attention to the variability of the income stream over time. There may be a need to reinvest a little extra when income goes up after a great year, for example. That might safeguard against an income drop if the markets go down the following year. If the fund is subject to successive down years, the income stream will decline too. No solution is perfect when we try to predict the future, eh? But the bottom line is that simpler solutions exist for most investing styles & strategies. And for varying levels of distributions. Regardless of the investing strategy that is preferred, it shouldn’t stop an investor exploring ways to tidy up a messy & confusing portfolio. Especially if it reduces stress, while improving visibility & returns. Decluttering can be both refreshing & potentially rewarding.

If you can’t get your head around having so few holdings, how about putting the BMO one (ZEQT) in the RRSP, the iShares one (XEQT) in the TFSA, & Vanguard’s (VEQT) in the non-registered. Each one of these is globally diversified. They own a little piece of everything traded on the public markets. These are all essentially identical. But I get it. I totally feel the need to spread it around the different fund companies myself! There is also something to be said for making the single ticker solutions the core of a portfolio. While leaving a smaller allocation available for some gambling on the side. Sorry, I meant some intelligent macro investing on the side to boost alpha! If you know you can do it well, or if you can afford the greater uncertainty of return for a small part of the portfolio, then it might be fun, no it’s still crazy, okay! 😜

One other consideration. If the current messy portfolio performance is seriously lagging that of a single ticker solution, ask why. There may be good reasons why. And good reasons to justify staying the course with existing investments. But if we can’t come up with good answers (that aren’t guesswork or wishful thinking!), then consider this … if a portfolio is consistently underperforming the single ticker ETFs by an amount that is significantly more than 1%, it might be better off in the hands of an advisor who only charges 1% to manage the portfolio. Even if all the advisor does is invest it all into ZEQT or VBAL & manage the financial planning & cashflows for the investor thereafter!

There is also one big caution with all this. Decluttering a portfolio isn’t like spring cleaning at home. Do NOT rush into selling a bunch of stuff without getting some professional tax & investing advice. A long-term holding in a non-registered account, for example, may have significant capital gains tax liability if sold off. It might bump income up to a higher tax bracket. It might generate income that exceeds an OAS clawback limit, & so on. There are many potential issues, so seeking professional help is often the best course. There can be other challenges with balancing different fund types across the different account types. If you don’t know how to manage all this, get some help. Even if you’re just not sure if you know enough to manage all this, get some help first!

If you want to learn more about saving & investing, please check out Double Double Your Money, available at your local Amazon store.

Important – this is not investing, tax or legal advice, it is for entertainment & conversation-provoking purposes only. Data may not be accurate. Check the current & historical data carefully at any company’s or provider’s website, particularly where a specific product, stock or fund is mentioned. Opinions are my own & I regularly get things wrong, so do your own due diligence & seek professional advice before investing your money.

Beware of Advice from Recent Retirees!

Paul - The Wry Eye Guy Leave a comment
Gambling on Retirement!

It’s unfair to tarnish all retirees with that statement, some might be offering great advice. But I’d be a little more circumspect about advice from those retirees advocating for earlier retirement because of their recent success. Some of these well-meaning folk might be suffering from recency bias. What’s that?

Anyone retiring in the past 15 years, with big stock market exposure, has probably been pretty lucky. Or, as they might prefer to see it … they are brilliant investors! This is especially true if their portfolio was biased towards the US markets. S&P500 Index® funds have returned close to 14% annually. The tech heavy Nasdaq 100 Index® has done even better.
I have to admit, some of them do look like investing geniuses!

Over the past decade & a half, it almost didn’t matter what strategy was employed. Just about any broad based American equity funds worked well. The growth investor did well & dividend investors did well. Investors who choose funds delivering huge yields via covered calls & partial leverage did well. They are all still doing well. Some of these retirees are mocking the old 4% Rule. As they sip frozen margaritas on a beach in the Caribbean! They are having a ball. And it’s hard to argue with success. But this might not apply to the next batch of retirees. And those with more limited finances need to be especially careful.

The 4% Rule is not a rule, it’s a rule of thumb. A guide only. But there are good reasons for its existence. Reasons that are at least broadly acknowledged by most. In a “normal” world, the safe withdrawal rate of 4% generally worked. In the “modern” world, it seems like you can haul out 12 or 13% every year & ride that gravy train all the way to the bank. Or the beach! That’s been the story for anyone retiring from 2010 onwards. The few blips we had along the way, like the one earlier this year, another in 2022, the 2020 downdraft for covid. They all repaired so quickly that nobody really noticed these as bad events. In fact, all those rapid blips did was reinforce the “buy the dip” philosophy. And, for those who didn’t panic, that has worked out very well.

But there will almost certainly come a time, where the dips will hurt a little more than these recent examples. There will be more enduring dips. And in such times, the 4% withdrawal rate may be more appropriate for managing retirement income risk. Ask anyone who retired in 2000. I’m not kidding, find an older retiree & ask. You probably won’t find them on social media! The experiences of more recent retirees is not how things always were. And while the good times are still rolling, they may not continue forever.
In case you can’t track down one of those older retirees, read this post on the Safe Withdrawal Rate in Retirement.

If you were planning on saving a million bucks before retiring, but you’ve only made it to half a million so far, pause a minute. Think very, very carefully about taking any advice that suggests you can retire immediately on your half-sized stash. Some recent retirees may think it’s okay to use 10% withdrawals nowadays. Or maybe they suggest that you can buy a bunch of funds yielding 10, 12, or even 15%, & go enjoy life sooner. This might not be good advice. Remember the old investing disclaimer: past performance is not indicative of future returns? In fact, it’s more likely going to be the opposite. After such an amazingly good run of returns, it’s far more likely that future returns will not be as good.

Look, I don’t know what the future holds. Maybe these enthusiastic retirees are right. But for anyone on the threshold of retirement, or for those younger retirees with a longer retirement timeline, caution is warranted. I’m sure I would enjoy spending a little more after a really good year of returns. And I’d probably do that again the following year, if there was another good year in the bank. But I would not start out a full retirement cycle of 20 or 30 years with the expectation that 10% a year is going to be the norm. While it’s not a commandment, I would treat that 4% Rule of Thumb with a little respect. I sure hope that we might still enjoy some good years of 5 or 6% spending. Who knows, maybe even a little more than that from time to time. Actually, let’s be honest here, I’m really hoping that 10% thing holds up for my retirement, from beginning to end! But I’m not taking that optimistic hope to the bank for the long haul. It’s probably not going to work as a good financial planning number!

If you can’t figure this all out on your own, please see a qualified financial planner & step through the process carefully with them. They will help you figure out how much you need to save to retire. And how much you might be able to spend during retirement. I know it’s expensive to work with a financial planner, but it might prove to be money well spent. Rather than finding out that you got it wrong half way through retirement.

If you want to learn more about saving & investing, please check out Double Double Your Money, available at your local Amazon store.

Important – this is not investing, tax or legal advice, it is for entertainment & conversation-provoking purposes only. Data may not be accurate. Check the current & historical data carefully at any company’s or provider’s website, particularly where a specific product, stock or fund is mentioned. Opinions are my own & I regularly get things wrong, so do your own due diligence & seek professional advice before investing your money.

Growth or Yield for Retirement Income?

Paul - The Wry Eye Guy Leave a comment
Growth or Yield?

Since Jack Bogle came up with the idea, it’s been difficult to beat a market index portfolio for total return. This approach can work well over decades of saving & investing for retirement. But we can feel differently about things as we get older. After a lifetime of picking up a regular paycheque, we’d really like a regular paycheque in retirement too, eh? And if there isn’t a nice pension ready to deliver that paycheque, income investing might have appeal.

Interest rates & bond yields have declined over the past couple of decades, so not much income to be had there. Even old-fashioned dividends have declined, particularly in the US equity market, as valuations increased. Some years ago, fund companies realised the boomer retirement market was in search of bigger income streams. In response, they created covered call funds with higher distribution yields. More recently, fund creators are adding some leverage. This not only boosts the distribution yield, but it also boosts the potential to recover the some of the return that covered call writing tends to lop off. Here’s one example of how this might work …

This is a simple comparison between HYLD (Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF) & VSP (Vanguard S&P 500 Index® ETF). Hamilton describes HYLD as having an “overall sector mix broadly similar to the S&P 500®”. Since it’s hedged back to the Canadian dollar, we are comparing it to VSP, from Vanguard Canada, which is also hedged. The equivalents from iShares (XSP) & BMO (ZUE) would also work for this. HYLD has only been around since February 2022, so it’s far too short a time to say how it will fare over the long-term. For this exercise, I trimmed off the first year’s performance for HYLD. Because it contained some third party funds that might have impacted performance. These were gradually replaced by Hamilton’s own funds & performance improved. Though it shortens the timeline, I think it is a fairer comparison for guesstimating what it could look like going forward.

With all dividends & distributions reinvested from March 2023 up to July 25th, 2025, the result sees VSP compounding at a shade over 21.6% annually & HYLD comes in at 20.9%. Over that time HYLD actually took the lead occasionally but, for the most part, they tracked very closely together. I think it’s fair to call it a tie. For a $100k investment, VSP would have grown to about $160.5k, while HYLD would have turned into about $158.2k. In contrast, the yield from VSP is only about 1%, while HYLD is currently throwing off almost 13%. Despite the huge difference in yield, the total return is virtually identical.

Each investing strategy brings its own unique challenges for a retiree. The “growth” investor has to decide how many shares to sell to augment the income. The “income” investor has to decide how much of the distribution should be reinvested to ensure the success of the portfolio into the future. That’s a bit of a challenge for either one, so we’ll start by paying out $1,000.00 a month. That’s a simple annual withdrawal rate of 12% based on the starting value. And, to keep pace with inflation, we’ll adjust the income stream over time. Since the annualised growth rates were over 20% for both funds, that sounds reasonably conservative, eh? With this arrangement, both funds deliver an identical income stream of just over $29k to the investors over the almost two & a half year period. After all withdrawals, HYLD has an end value of $122.2k, with $124.2k in VSP. Again, little to no difference. This is a great outcome for both investing strategies.

Along with a great monthly cheque, the other important thing here is that the remaining value of both portfolios, after all withdrawals, is well up from the original $100k invested. Using the Bank of Canada’s inflation calculator, a portfolio value of $100k at the start of 2023 would equate to a value of about $107.5k in 2025. Since both funds are well ahead of this number by the end of the comparison, that bodes well. In fact, we could have started with a $1,400.00 dollar monthly withdrawal & the end values of both funds would have been in line with the inflation adjusted portfolio value needed for the future. But my crystal ball was broken back in 2023, so I took a safer path! 😜
That larger withdrawal amount would have been a withdrawal rate closer to 17%. Wow!

Some huge words of caution about this example: 12% is not a typical withdrawal rate over the course of a 30 year retirement. High yield percentages can not automatically be used as a withdrawal rate either. It may be possible for a time, but we also need to keep an eye on the underlying share price. And on the trajectory of the income stream. Is it going up or down? Are we keeping up with inflation? Unfortunately, we have to plan for an uncertain future. We can’t depend on the markets delivering consistently incredible returns over a long retirement timeline. Indeed returns are very uncertain over any future timeline, long or short. Look at the total return profile of your portfolio, not just the yield. In this case, there are older S&P 500 Index® funds that can be back-tested to show how precarious retirement life can be. At times, withdrawal rates much closer to 4% were required. It will be interesting to see if some of the newer funds can do better.

There are some very good reasons that the 4% Rule (of Thumb!) was used as a baseline for evaluating retirement plans. These days, a financial planner will use some pretty sophisticated software to plot out what’s possible for a given set of circumstances & predictions. In addition, the plan may produce higher or lower income streams based on individual investor choices. Financial plans should be reviewed regularly. Each new year starts with the new return estimates. Along with age revisions (money needed for fewer years with each passing year!), revised needs & wants, etc. And, of course, the current portfolio value is now the new portfolio value for planning the rest of the retirement journey. An investor that is willing & able to tolerate large income swings from one year to another may be able to sail closer to the wind on higher withdrawals. As would a retiree with a large guaranteed income stream from pensions, for example. Without that safety net, it can be far more challenging. The superb performance of the US markets for the past decade or more might have us believing that there are unicorns & leprechauns underneath all the rainbows & sunbeams. Tread very carefully. For most of us, it’s likely worth shelling out for a professional financial planning review to see what’s possible. The good & the bad.

One last thing: regardless of which strategy you favour, it’s usually worth listening to the other point of view. I know both growth & income investors that are killing it with their chosen strategy. Then there are some that aren’t quite sure how well, or how poorly, they are doing. We can all learn something new, eh? There may even be circumstances, both data driven & psychological, that encourage using a combination of strategies to navigate retirement. It’s usually worth taking the time to see a different perspective. And it might help to Benchmark Your DIY Portfolio against one of those recommended by experts & professionals in the field. Knowing how your portfolio behaves may help with engagement during the financial planning conversion.

Happy retirement spending!

If you want to learn more about saving & investing, please check out Double Double Your Money, available at your local Amazon store.

Important – this is not investing, tax or legal advice, it is for entertainment & conversation-provoking purposes only. Data may not be accurate. Check the current & historical data carefully at any company’s or provider’s website, particularly where a specific product, stock or fund is mentioned. Opinions are my own & I regularly get things wrong, so do your own due diligence & seek professional advice before investing your money.

DIY Investing or Work With a Financial Advisor?

Paul - The Wry Eye Guy Leave a comment
Good old-fashioned financial advice.
But at what price?

DIY investing can drive you a little crazy. Do you like the crazy? Are you enjoying the work that comes with portfolio management? Some of us do! But it gets a little more challenging when we need to withdraw money during retirement. And will a surviving spouse be able to carry on with the crazy portfolio in the event the “money manager” departs first? Are you a good DIY investor? Or would you do better with an advisor?

There is an easy way to figure out if you should consider paying a fee to have a professional manage your portfolio & the retirement cashflow stream for you.
And it’s this …

Compare your DIY portfolio performance against an equivalent ETF. We all need a “benchmark” to check our portfolio against. If you’re 100% in globally diversified stocks, for example, compare your portfolio performance to that of one of the XEQT, ZEQT, VEQT all-equity ETFs. If you’re in a 60/40 stock & fixed income mix, compare your DIY portfolio performance against XBAL, ZBAL, or VBAL. Are you buying a mix of Canadian & US large-cap stocks? Then compare that to an appropriately allocated portfolio of VFV & XIU ETFs. A portfolio filled with way too many stocks & ETFs might also be usefully compared against one of the all-in-ones. If your portfolio performance lags its benchmark by 1% or more, you might want to consider handing it over to a financial manager.

As an aside, since some of these all-in-one funds are so new, you may need to break them down into their constituent ETFs to usefully use them for benchmarking over longer time periods. The longer the history, the more useful the insights.

I’m using 1% here because many financial advisors charge an annual 1% of portfolio value as a fee for managing a portfolio. Is that fee worth it? Get the advisor’s performance history & compare that to an equivalent benchmark ETF too. Their recommended portfolio should only lag the return performance of those ETFs by the 1% fee. If they meet that requirement and if your self-managed portfolio was lagging by more than 1%, you could be getting better results by paying the advisor the 1% fee. As a bonus, you’ll have less work & an advisor who will tell you that everything will be okay when the markets are imploding. Hand-holding is included in their fee! For retirees, the advisor may also plan the income strategy & tax-efficiently manage the cashflow for you, across all accounts. You might even get some estate planning advice along the way. If you have a good advisor, they can deliver a lot of value. Even if they underperform the market average by the amount of the fee they charge.

Can you find an advisor that will consistently beat, after fees, the market or benchmark returns? I don’t know, but be sure to review their data supporting this opinion very carefully. And not necessarily against the benchmark provided by the advisor.

Unfortunately, it can be pretty challenging to tell if an advisor is any good. And those investors who are most challenged by DIY investing will also be challenged by the process of choosing a good advisor. We all like to believe we have the best doctor taking care of our health. In reality, most of them will be closer to average than exceptional. Fortunately, there are minimum standards & qualifications that we hope will ensure an adequate level of service from these professionals. The same is only variably true for financial advisors. Because the qualifications for calling yourself a financial advisor in Canada are variable. Some advisors are closer to being a product salesperson. And while some feel or profess a fiduciary responsibility, it is not a legal duty or obligation for many. They cannot just take your money & head off to a beach somewhere, but they may be putting their own, or their company’s, interests just slightly ahead of yours when it comes to investment choices. Even if only subconsciously.

Of course, a good salesperson will make you feel better about the relationship you are getting into. And that’s not a bad thing. But you also need an advisor who can at least deliver average market returns for a broadly diversified portfolio. Minus the fees. And you do need to know exactly how much you’re paying for whatever services & products are being recommended! There may be advisory fees and product fees, check carefully.

If you are a balanced 60/40 style investor, what would you think of paying an advisor to put all your money into ZBAL? Or maybe 60% into XEQT, with the other 40% into a couple of bond & HISA-type ETFs? We sometimes resent paying for simplicity. Advisors know this & are less likely to present you with such a simple portfolio solution. After all, if things are that simple, why would we need an advisor!
Yet, in DIY mode, we sometimes struggle to follow the simple path ourselves. Instead, we prefer to work hard creating a portfolio that underperforms!

Of course, that simple solution might not be the ideal path for everyone. There may well be good reasons for some investors to pursue a lower volatility strategy, a higher income strategy, or whatever. But it is still useful to compare the total return on our own portfolios against those of low-cost, market index ETFs.

Robo-advisors are trying to bridge the gap between the advisory space & DIY, typically for about a 0.5% fee premium, in addition to ETF fees. I love the idea but it feels like you’re paying the added fee for the robo to pick the same ETFs that are in the all-in-one ETFs. Like some human services, they can fancy it up with one or two more esoteric picks. So you feel like you’re getting something extra for your money. But you generally won’t get the more valuable hand-holding that comes with the more expensive advisory services. Maybe AI will help with this down the road. But AI has been around for a lot longer than current market noise suggests & it hasn’t happened yet. Some robo-services do include human phone support. That might develop & grow into something more valuable going forward.

Isn’t there scope for fee reduction on the human advisory side too? Or for a service with a far more rapidly declining tiered fee-structure for larger portfolios? Are there any low-cost advisors out there? Shouldn’t there be more advisors competing with the 0.5% fees of the robo-advisors. Simpler portfolio advice & management should come with lower fees, no? I’m okay with portfolios constructed with low cost index funds. For some investors, the greater value may be more in managing asset location (what ETF goes in which account) & retirement cashflow. Some advisors include financial planning, a valuable service too. But can it be done for a 0.5% fee? Or less?

I realise that someone else’s job always looks easier than it really is from the outside. But I think financial advisory (& real estate) fees are very expensive in Canada. Particularly for the cookie-cutter portfolios offered by some companies. I’m totally okay with the right cookie-cutter portfolio, I just don’t want to pay through the nose for it. High fees are an ignorance premium being levied on a population that didn’t get this kind of knowledge coming through our educational system. And our schools still don’t prepare kids for the digital environment that now makes it far easier for the DIY investor to learn things the hard way. Fees will likely drop over time, as education & AI combine to work at improving the competitive landscape. Though in traditional Canadian fashion, it’ll probably drag out for a long time yet. And some of us older folk might not live long enough to benefit! 🤪

Regardless of the path we choose, it’s worth occasionally benchmarking our portfolio performance against a low-cost, well-diversified, ETF portfolio. One that approximately matches our portfolio’s asset allocation. Benchmarking can provide insight on how decent a job we’re doing with our investing strategy. And if we’re not doing such a good job ourselves, it may be worth talking to a financial advisor. But if you still find the idea of paying an advisor distasteful, then you’d better figure out how to learn to do it better on your own. Or maybe just use the benchmark ETFs instead!

If you want to learn more about saving & investing from the ground up, I’d like to suggest that you check out Double Double Your Money, available at your local Amazon store.

Important – this is not investing, tax or legal advice, it is for entertainment & conversation-provoking purposes only. Data may not be accurate. Check the current & historical data carefully at any company’s or provider’s website, particularly where a specific product, stock or fund is mentioned. Opinions are my own & I regularly get things wrong, so do your own due diligence & seek professional advice before investing your money.